Secondary Structure Preferences of the Anthrax Toxin Protective Antigen Translocase
JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIn order for many proteins to move across hydrophobic membrane bilayers, they must be unfolded and translocated by a membrane-embedded channel. These translocase channels interact with the substrate proteins they translocate via hydrophobic pore loops and cleft structures called clamps. The molecular basis for how clamps facilitate unfolding and translocation is poorly understood. Anthrax toxin is composed of three proteins, a translocase channel-forming subunit, called protective antigen (PA), and two substrate proteins, called lethal factor (LF) and edema factor. Oligomeric PA forms a large channel that contains three types of polypeptide clamp sites: an α clamp, a phenylalanine clamp, and a charge clamp. Currently, it is thought that these clamp sites operate allosterically and promote translocation via an allosteric helix compression mechanism. Here, we report on the substrate secondary structure dependence of the PA channel. Peptides derived from regions of LF with high α-helical content bound cooperatively, but those derived from β-sheet regions in LF did not, suggesting that an allosteric site preferentially recognizes α-helical structure over β-sheet structure. Peptides derived from helical sites in LF showed increasingly longer single-channel blockades as a function of peptide concentration, a result that was consistent with stronger clamping behavior and reduced backsliding. Moreover, peptides derived from helical regions of LF translocated more efficiently than peptides derived from β-sheet regions of LF. Overall, in support of the allosteric helix compression model, we find that the channel prefers α-helical sequences over β-sheet sequences. Copyright 2017 The Authors
SponsorsThis work was supported by an NIH grant, R01 AI077703.
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85010867860&doi=10.1016%2fj.jmb.2017.01.015&partnerID=40&md5=bcebae77748b6b10c23655a47f2e914a; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/9963