Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSartelli, M.
dc.contributor.authorKluger, Y.
dc.contributor.authorAnsaloni, L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-21T18:46:34Z
dc.date.available2019-06-21T18:46:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85041557584&doi=10.1186%2fs13017-018-0165-6&partnerID=40&md5=dc3c4fce0f0bbdd1b612e4276de5e9d6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/9790
dc.description.abstractThe Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery appreciates the great effort of the task force who derived and validated the Sepsis-3 definitions and considers the new definitions an important step forward in the evolution of our understanding of sepsis. Nevertheless, more than a year after their publication, we have a few concerns regarding the use of the Sepsis-3 definitions. Copyright 2018 The Author(s).en_US
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0165-6en_US
dc.language.isoen-USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery
dc.subjectInfectionsen_US
dc.subjectOrgan dysfunctionen_US
dc.subjectSepsisen_US
dc.subjectSeptic shocken_US
dc.titleRaising concerns about the Sepsis-3 definitionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13017-018-0165-6
dc.identifier.pmid29416555


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record