• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2018
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2018
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Feine, J.
    Abou-Ayash, S.
    Al Mardini, M.
    Date
    2018
    Journal
    Clinical Oral Implants Research
    Publisher
    John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13299
    Abstract
    Objectives: The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant-retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health-related quality of life (e.g., SF-36). Materials and methods: The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved. Results: Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients' ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Patient-reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients' satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success. Copyright 2018 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Keyword
    clinical research
    clinical trials
    patient-centered outcomes
    prosthodontics
    systematic reviews
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055034892&doi=10.1111%2fclr.13299&partnerID=40&md5=2833a5fe0f0e146225b4431cfc571d40; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/9769
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1111/clr.13299
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles 2018

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Immediate occluding definitive partial fixed prosthesis versus non-occluding provisional restorations - 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    • Authors: Heinemann F, Grufferty B, Papavasiliou G, Dominiak M, García JJ, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Esposito M
    • Issue date: 2016 Spring
    • Patient-reported outcome measures focusing on aesthetics of implant- and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    • Authors: Wittneben JG, Wismeijer D, Brägger U, Joda T, Abou-Ayash S
    • Issue date: 2018 Oct
    • Immediate loading vs. early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentulous patients from the patients' perspective: A systematic review.
    • Authors: Huynh-Ba G, Oates TW, Williams MAH
    • Issue date: 2018 Oct
    • Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry.
    • Authors: Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS, Pjetursson B, Polido W, Roehling S, Sailer I, Aghaloo T, Albera H, Bohner L, Braut V, Buser D, Chen S, Dawson A, Eckert S, Gahlert M, Hamilton A, Jaffin R, Jarry C, Karayazgan B, Laine J, Martin W, Rahman L, Schlegel A, Shiota M, Stilwell C, Vorster C, Zembic A, Zhou W
    • Issue date: 2018 Oct
    • Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines.
    • Authors: De Bruyn H, Raes S, Ostman PO, Cosyn J
    • Issue date: 2014 Oct
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.