Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry
Date
2018Journal
Clinical Oral Implants ResearchPublisher
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objectives: The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant-retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health-related quality of life (e.g., SF-36). Materials and methods: The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved. Results: Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients' ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Patient-reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients' satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success. Copyright 2018 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Identifier to cite or link to this item
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055034892&doi=10.1111%2fclr.13299&partnerID=40&md5=2833a5fe0f0e146225b4431cfc571d40; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/9769ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/clr.13299
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Immediate occluding definitive partial fixed prosthesis versus non-occluding provisional restorations - 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial.
- Authors: Heinemann F, Grufferty B, Papavasiliou G, Dominiak M, García JJ, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Esposito M
- Issue date: 2016 Spring
- Patient-reported outcome measures focusing on aesthetics of implant- and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Authors: Wittneben JG, Wismeijer D, Brägger U, Joda T, Abou-Ayash S
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Immediate loading vs. early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentulous patients from the patients' perspective: A systematic review.
- Authors: Huynh-Ba G, Oates TW, Williams MAH
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry.
- Authors: Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS, Pjetursson B, Polido W, Roehling S, Sailer I, Aghaloo T, Albera H, Bohner L, Braut V, Buser D, Chen S, Dawson A, Eckert S, Gahlert M, Hamilton A, Jaffin R, Jarry C, Karayazgan B, Laine J, Martin W, Rahman L, Schlegel A, Shiota M, Stilwell C, Vorster C, Zembic A, Zhou W
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines.
- Authors: De Bruyn H, Raes S, Ostman PO, Cosyn J
- Issue date: 2014 Oct