Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials
JournalPLoS neglected tropical diseases
PublisherPublic Library of Science
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractDengue is a major public health problem worldwide. Although several drug candidates have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials, none has been effective and at present, early recognition of severe dengue and timely supportive care are used to reduce mortality. While the first dengue vaccine was recently licensed, and several other candidates are in late stage clinical trials, future decisions regarding widespread deployment of vaccines and/or therapeutics will require evidence of product safety, efficacy and effectiveness. Standard, quantifiable clinical endpoints are needed to ensure reproducibility and comparability of research findings. To address this need, we established a working group of dengue researchers and public health specialists to develop standardized endpoints and work towards consensus opinion on those endpoints. After discussion at two working group meetings and presentations at international conferences, a Delphi methodology-based query was used to finalize and operationalize the clinical endpoints. Participants were asked to select the best endpoints from proposed definitions or offer revised/new definitions, and to indicate whether contributing items should be designated as optional or required. After the third round of inquiry, 70% or greater agreement was reached on moderate and severe plasma leakage, moderate and severe bleeding, acute hepatitis and acute liver failure, and moderate and severe neurologic disease. There was less agreement regarding moderate and severe thrombocytopenia and moderate and severe myocarditis. Notably, 68% of participants agreed that a 50,000 to 20,000 mm3 platelet range be used to define moderate thrombocytopenia; however, they remained divided on whether a rapid decreasing trend or one platelet count should be case defining. While at least 70% agreement was reached on most endpoints, the process identified areas for further evaluation and standardization within the context of ongoing clinical studies. These endpoints can be used to harmonize data collection and improve comparability between dengue clinical trials.
Clinical Trials as Topic
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85054460664&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pntd.0006497&partnerID=40&md5=19c7234fb95bb6320b40e608b282da2a; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/9751
- Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials: introduction and methodology.
- Authors: Jaenisch T, Hendrickx K, Erpicum M, Agulto L, Tomashek KM, Dempsey W, Siqueira JB, Marks MA, Fay MP, Laughlin C, L'Azou M, Leo YS, Narvaez F, Teyssou R, Thomas SJ, Tissera H, Wallace D, Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ, Cassetti MC
- Issue date: 2018 Nov 15
- Dengue illness index-A tool to characterize the subjective dengue illness experience.
- Authors: Thomas SJ, Agulto L, Hendrickx K, Erpicum M, Tomashek KM, Cassetti MC, Laughlin C, Precioso A, Schmidt AC, Narvaez F, Siqueira JB, Tissera H, Edelman R
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Controlling dengue with vaccines in Thailand.
- Authors: Chao DL, Halstead SB, Halloran ME, Longini IM Jr
- Issue date: 2012
- A recombinant live attenuated tetravalent vaccine for the prevention of dengue.
- Authors: Guy B, Noriega F, Ochiai RL, L'azou M, Delore V, Skipetrova A, Verdier F, Coudeville L, Savarino S, Jackson N
- Issue date: 2017 Jul
- Dengue vaccines: progress and challenges.
- Authors: Coller BA, Clements DE
- Issue date: 2011 Jun
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dengue illness index-A tool to characterize the subjective dengue illness experienceThomas, Stephen J.; Agulto, Liane; Edelman, Robert (PLOS One, 2018-10-01)Dengue virus infections are a major cause of febrile illness that significantly affects individual and societal productivity and drives up health care costs principally in the developing world. Two dengue vaccine candidates are in advanced clinical efficacy trials in Latin America and Asia, and another has been licensed in more than fifteen countries but its uptake has been limited. Despite these advances, standardized metrics for comparability of protective efficacy between dengue vaccines remain poorly defined. The Dengue Illness Index (DII) is a tool that we developed thru refinement of previous similar iterations in an attempt to improve and standardize the measurement of vaccine and drug efficacy in reducing moderate dengue illness. The tool is designed to capture an individual's overall disease experience based on how the totality of their symptoms impacts their general wellness and daily functionality. We applied the DII to a diary card, the Dengue Illness Card (DIC), which was examined and further developed by a working group. The card was then refined with feedback garnered from a Delphi methodology-based query that addressed the adequacy and applicability of the tool in clinical dengue research. There was overall agreement that the tool would generate useful data and provide an alternative perspective to the assessment of drug or vaccine candidates, which in the case of vaccines, are assessed by their reduction in any virologically confirmed dengue of any severity with a focus on the more severe. The DIC needs to be evaluated in the field in the context of vaccine or drug trials, prospective cohort studies, or during experimental human infection studies. Here, we present the final DIC resulting from the Delphi process and offer its further development or use to the dengue research community.
Safety and Immunogenicity of an AS03B-Adjuvanted Inactivated Tetravalent Dengue Virus Vaccine Administered on Varying Schedules to Healthy U.S. Adults: A Phase 1/2 Randomized StudyLin, L.; Lyke, K.E.; Koren, M.; Jarman, R.G.; Eckels, K.H.; Lepine, E.; McArthur, M.A.; Currier, J.R.; Friberg, H.; Moris, P.; et al. (American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020)Dengue disease and its causative agents, the dengue viruses (DENV-1–4), cause high morbidity in tropical and subtropical regions. We evaluated three dosing regimens of the investigational tetravalent AS03B-adjuvanted dengue-purified inactivated vaccine (DPIV+AS03B). In this phase 1/2, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT02421367), 140 healthy adults were randomized 1:1:2 to receive DPIV+AS03B according to the following regimens: 0–1 month (M), 0–1–6 M, or 0–3 M. Participants received DPIV+AS03B or placebo at M0, M1, M3, and M6 according to their dosing schedule. Primary objectives were 1) to evaluate the safety of DPIV+AS03B for 28 days (D) after each dose; 2) to demonstrate the added value of a booster dose (0–1–6 M versus 0–1 M) based on neutralizing antibody titers to each DENV type (DENV-1–4) at 28 D after the last dose; and, if this objective was met, 3) to demonstrate the benefit of a longer interval between the first and second doses (0–1 M versus 0–3 M). Adverse events (AEs) within 7 D after vaccination tended to be more frequent after DPIV+AS03B doses than placebo; the number of grade 3 AEs was low (£ 4.5% after DPIV+AS03B; £ 2.9% after placebo), with no obvious differences across groups. Within 28 D following each dose, the frequency of unsolicited AEs after DPIV+AS03B appeared higher for three-dose (0–1–6 M) than two-dose (0–1 M and 0–3 M) regimens. No serious AEs were considered related to vaccination, and no potential immune-mediated diseases were reported during the study. All three schedules were well tolerated. Both primary immunogenicity objectives were demonstrated. The 0–3 M and 0–1–6 M regimens were more immunogenic than the 0–1 M regimen.
Model-based assessment of public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination following screening for prior exposureEspaña, Guido; Anderson, Kathryn B.; Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.; Yao, Yutong (Public Library of Science, 2019-07-01)The tetravalent dengue vaccine CYD-TDV (Dengvaxia) is the first licensed vaccine against dengue, but recent findings indicate an elevated risk of severe disease among vaccinees without prior dengue virus (DENV) exposure. The World Health Organization currently recommends CYD-TDV only for individuals with serological confirmation of past DENV exposure. Our objective was to evaluate the potential health impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination following serological screening. To do so, we used an agent-based model to simulate DENV transmission with and without vaccination over a 10-year timeframe. Across a range of values for the proportion of vaccinees with prior DENV exposure, we projected the proportion of symptomatic and hospitalized cases averted as a function of the sensitivity and specificity of serological screening. Scenarios about the cost-effectiveness of screening and vaccination were chosen to be representative of Brazil and the Philippines. We found that public health impact depended primarily on sensitivity in high-transmission settings and on specificity in low-transmission settings. Cost-effectiveness could be achievable from the perspective of a public payer provided that sensitivity and the value of a disability-adjusted life-year were both high, but only in high-transmission settings. Requirements for reducing relative risk and achieving cost-effectiveness from an individual perspective were more restricted, due to the fact that those who test negative pay for screening but receive no benefit. Our results predict that cost-effectiveness could be achieved only in high-transmission areas of dengue-endemic countries with a relatively high per capita GDP, such as Panamá (13,680 USD), Brazil (8,649 USD), México (8,201 USD), or Thailand (5,807 USD). In conclusion, vaccination with CYD-TDV following serological screening could have a positive impact in some high-transmission settings, provided that screening is highly specific (to minimize individual harm), at least moderately sensitive (to maximize population benefit), and sufficiently inexpensive (depending on the setting).