• Implementation and Evaluation of Staff Debriefing After Seclusion and Restraint Events

      Hernandez, Ashley D.; Satyshur, Rosemarie D. (2022-05)
      Problem and Purpose: Episodes of seclusion and restraint have recently increased by 380% from January-April 2021 compared to January-April 2020 in one adult Psychiatric Emergency Department in an academic medical center. Multiple factors contribute to this substantial increase in seclusion and restraint use; some factors are more amenable to practice change than others. The Psychiatric Emergency Department prioritizes patient safety and staff safety and aims to implement trauma-informed care. Evidence supports the importance of debriefing after a patient seclusion or restraint event to improve both patient and staff outcomes; however, staff debriefing is not currently practiced in the department. The purpose of this project is to implement staff debriefing after seclusion and restraint events in a Psychiatric Emergency Department. Methods: A quality improvement project was designed to implement a staff debriefing after patient seclusion and restraint events to assist in keeping staff and patients physically and psychologically safe. The goals of this project are to educate and train 100% of identified unit change champions on the debriefing process, debrief 100% of seclusion and restraint events on the unit during the implementation period and complete eight key debriefing components, and reduce seclusion and restraint events on the unit during the implementation period compared to the same timeframe in 2020 by 95%. Results: 100% of identified change champions were trained. The percentage of debriefings completed was 43%. The number of seclusion and restraint events rose by 126%. Conclusions: Reduction of seclusion and restraint events is multi-faceted and staff debriefing is a portion of the initiative and more time is needed to ensure implementation into unit culture and sustainability. The debriefing tool has been adopted for use throughout the organization’s Department of Psychiatry.
    • A Restraint Alternative Program on the Neurotrauma Intermediate Care Unit

      Trinh, Tammie E.; Seidl, Kristin L. (2021-05)
      Problem & Purpose: Restraint use has been associated with risks to patient safety, including physical injury, cognitive and functional impairment, agitation and delirium, increased psychological distress for patients and family, and even death. The Joint Commission, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the American Nurses Association all support the reduction of restraint use in order to improve patient safety. On a Neurotrauma Intermediate Care (IMC) unit at an urban, academic medical center, the prevalence of restraint use is consistently higher than the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators mean. The purpose of this quality improvement project is to implement an evidence-based restraint alternative program consisting of a Restraint Decision Wheel, improved restraint alternative supply, and charge nurse restraint rounding in order to reduce restraint prevalence on the Neurotrauma IMC Unit. Methods: Improvements in restraint alternative supply, provision of the Restraint Decision Wheel, and charge nurse restraint rounds were implemented on the unit. Staff training was provided on restraint alternatives and use of the Restraint Decision Wheel. The project champion team met twice monthly to strategize improvements to project implementation. Data were collected to evaluate adherence to process changes through electronic health record audits, survey, and restraint rounding forms. Outcome and balancing measures tracked included restraint prevalence and unintentional device removal. Data were analyzed using run charts. Results: Restraint prevalence was variable throughout the early weeks of the project, but a non-random pattern was demonstrated by project completion with a shift of 6 consecutive points below the median. The median Restraint Decision Wheel Utilization was 43% and charge nurses rounded a median 21% of shifts per week. 10 unintentional device removal occurrences were reported during the project. Conclusions: Implementation of the restraint alternative program was associated with a significant decrease in restraint prevalence. Use of the Restraint Decision Wheel was incorporated into practice more frequently than charge nurse rounding. No significant safety events occurred from unintentional device removal. Overall, implementation of a restraint alternative program is a low-cost, safe, and effective intervention for reducing restraint prevalence.