Comparison and validation of screening tools for substance use in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study conducted in Maryland prenatal clinics
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIntroduction Prescription-drug use in the USA has increased by more than 60% in the last three decades. Prevalence of prescription-drug use among pregnant women is currently estimated around 50%. Prevalence of illicit drug use in the USA is 14.6% among pregnant adolescents, 8.6% among pregnant young adults and 3.2% among pregnant adults. The first step in identifying problematic drug use during pregnancy is screening; however, no specific substance-use screener has been universally recommended for use with pregnant women to identify illicit or prescription-drug use. This study compares and validates three existing substance-use screeners for pregnancy - 4 P's Plus, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Quick Screen/Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and the Substance Use Risk Profile-Pregnancy (SURP-P) scale. Methods and analysis This is a cross-sectional study designed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and usability of existing substance-use screeners. Recruitment occurs at two obstetrics clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. We are recruiting 500 participants to complete a demographic questionnaire, NIDA Quick Screen/ASSIST, 4 P's Plus and SURP-P (ordered randomly) during their regularly scheduled prenatal appointment, then again 1 week later by telephone. Participants consent to multidrug urine testing, hair drug testing and allowing access to prescription drug and birth outcome data from electronic medical records. For each screener, reliability and validity will be assessed. Test-retest reliability analysis will be conducted by examining the results of repeated screener administrations within 1 week of original screener administrations for consistency via correlation analysis. Furthermore, we will assess if there are differences in the validity of each screener by age, race and trimester. Ethics and dissemination This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Maryland (HP-00072042), Baltimore, and Battelle Memorial Institute (0619-100106433). All participants are required to give their informed consent prior to any study procedure. Copyright Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
SponsorsFunding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DA041328.
nida quick screen/assist
substance use screening
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048575297&doi=10.1136%2fbmjopen-2017-020248&partnerID=40&md5=c688bd40198d54310f3e922358d7f235; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/9171
- Accuracy of Three Screening Tools for Prenatal Substance Use.
- Authors: Coleman-Cowger VH, Oga EA, Peters EN, Trocin KE, Koszowski B, Mark K
- Issue date: 2019 May
- Accuracy of five self-report screening instruments for substance use in pregnancy.
- Authors: Ondersma SJ, Chang G, Blake-Lamb T, Gilstad-Hayden K, Orav J, Beatty JR, Goyert GL, Yonkers KA
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- Prenatal Substance Use and Perceptions of Parent and Partner Use Using the 4P's Plus Screener.
- Authors: Oga EA, Peters EN, Mark K, Trocin K, Coleman-Cowger VH
- Issue date: 2019 Feb
- Validation of the 4P's Plus screen for substance use in pregnancy validation of the 4P's Plus.
- Authors: Chasnoff IJ, Wells AM, McGourty RF, Bailey LK
- Issue date: 2007 Dec
- Identification of substance use disorders among pregnant women: A comparison of screeners.
- Authors: Chang G, Ondersma SJ, Blake-Lamb T, Gilstad-Hayden K, Orav EJ, Yonkers KA
- Issue date: 2019 Dec 1