Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHowley, I.W.
dc.contributor.authorHaut, E.R.
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T12:53:05Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T12:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85051277801&doi=10.1136%2ftsaco-2017-000140&partnerID=40&md5=ba0b60ee7346fcfc039e053ad3d8b2ee
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/9101
dc.description.abstractThomboelastography (TEG) is a whole blood measure of coagulation which was originally described in the 1950s. However, it has only been in the last few decades that assays have become accessible and viable as a point-of-care test. Following the observation that hemorrhagic shock is associated with an intrinsic coagulopathy, TEG has been used as a method of diagnosing specific coagulation defects in order to direct individualized blood products resuscitation. An alternative transfusion strategy is the administration of fixed ratio products, a paradigm borne out of military experience. It is unknown which strategy is superior and this topic was debated at the 36th Annual Point/Counterpoint Acute Care Surgery Conference. The following article summarizes the discussants points of view along with a summary of the evidence.Level of Evidence Level III. Copyright Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000140en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTrauma Surgery and Acute Care Open
dc.subject1:1 resuscitationen_US
dc.subject.meshThromboelastographyen_US
dc.subject.meshResuscitationen_US
dc.titleIs thromboelastography (TEG)-based resuscitation better than empirical 1:1 transfusion?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/tsaco-2017-000140


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record