Is thromboelastography (TEG)-based resuscitation better than empirical 1:1 transfusion?
dc.contributor.author | Howley, I.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Haut, E.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jacobs, L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-17T12:53:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-17T12:53:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85051277801&doi=10.1136%2ftsaco-2017-000140&partnerID=40&md5=ba0b60ee7346fcfc039e053ad3d8b2ee | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10713/9101 | |
dc.description.abstract | Thomboelastography (TEG) is a whole blood measure of coagulation which was originally described in the 1950s. However, it has only been in the last few decades that assays have become accessible and viable as a point-of-care test. Following the observation that hemorrhagic shock is associated with an intrinsic coagulopathy, TEG has been used as a method of diagnosing specific coagulation defects in order to direct individualized blood products resuscitation. An alternative transfusion strategy is the administration of fixed ratio products, a paradigm borne out of military experience. It is unknown which strategy is superior and this topic was debated at the 36th Annual Point/Counterpoint Acute Care Surgery Conference. The following article summarizes the discussants points of view along with a summary of the evidence.Level of Evidence Level III. Copyright Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000140 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Trauma Surgery and Acute Care Open | |
dc.subject | 1:1 resuscitation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Thromboelastography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Resuscitation | en_US |
dc.title | Is thromboelastography (TEG)-based resuscitation better than empirical 1:1 transfusion? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000140 |