Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhu, T.H.
dc.contributor.authorHollister, L.
dc.contributor.authorOpoku, D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T12:53:05Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T12:53:05Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85032800900&doi=10.1111%2facem.13307&partnerID=40&md5=6fe380cb032156330b2c8793e40737dc
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/9100
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Recent studies using advanced statistical methods to control for confounders have demonstrated an association between helicopter transport (HT) versus ground ambulance transport (GT) in terms of improved survival for adult trauma patients. The aim of this study was to apply a methodologically vigorous approach to determine if HT is associated with a survival benefit for when trauma patients are transported to a verified trauma center in a rural setting. Methods: The ascertainment of trauma patients age ≥ 15 years (n = 469 cases) by HT and (n = 580 cases) by GT between 1999 and 2012 was restricted to the scene of injury in a rural area of 10 to 35 miles from the trauma center. The propensity score (PS) was determined using data including demographics, prehospital physiology, intubation, total prehospital time, and injury severity. The PS matching was performed with different calipers to select a higher percentage of matches of HT compared to GT patients. The outcome of interest was survival to discharge from hospital. Identical logistic regression analysis was done taking into account for each matched design to select an appropriate effect estimate and confidence interval (CI) controlling for initial vital signs in the emergency department, the need for urgent surgery, intensive care unit admission, and mechanical ventilation. Results: Unadjusted mortalities for HT compared to GT were 7.7 and 5.3%, respectively (p > 0.05). The adjusted rates were 4.0% for HT and 7.6% for GT (p < 0.05). In a PS well‐matched data set, HT was associated with a 2.69‐fold increase in odds of survival compared to GT patients (adjusted odds ratio = 2.69; 95% CI = 1.21–5.97). Conclusions: In a rural setting, we demonstrated improved survival associated with HT compared to GT for scene transportation of adult trauma patients to a verified Level II trauma center using an advanced methodologic approach, which included adjustment for transport distance. The implication of survival benefit to rural population is discussed. We recommend larger studies with multiple trauma systems need to be repeated using similar study methodology to substantiate our findings. Copyright 2017 The Authors. Academic Emergency Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acem.13307en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAcademic Emergency Medicine
dc.subjecttraumatic injuriesen_US
dc.subject.meshAir Ambulancesen_US
dc.titleImproved Survival for Rural Trauma Patients Transported by Helicopter to a Verified Trauma Center: A Propensity Score Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.13307
dc.identifier.pmid28898557


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record