Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZafar, S.N.
dc.contributor.authorFelton, J.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, K.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T12:53:02Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T12:53:02Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059497470&doi=10.4293%2fJSLS.2018.00056&partnerID=40&md5=aba2ce9da0565d0c4a29ea6ab16502f9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/9055
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objectives: Staple line treatment during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) remains a controversial issue among bariatric surgeons. The objective of this study was to compare rates of postoperative bleeding (POB) among various methods of staple line reinforcement. Methods: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program 2015 dataset was queried for patients undergoing an LSG. Patients were stratified by staple line treatment groups-no treatment (NT), suture oversewing (OVERSEW), buttressing by a commercial product (BUTTRESS), and both buttress and oversew (COMBINATION). The primary outcome was POB. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare POB rates among the treatment groups. Results: In the 98,142 LSG patients meeting selection criteria, 623 (0.63%) patients had POB and 181 (0.18%) required reoperation. POB occurred in 0.80% for the NT group, 0.68% for the OVERSEW group, 0.57% for the BUTTRESS group, and 0.55% for the COMBINATION group. On multivariable analyses, all treatment groups were less likely to have POB compared with the NT group-OVERSEW (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.98), BUTTRESS (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.84), and COMBINATION (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.89) (all P < .01). Subset analysis revealed no difference between BUTTRESS and OVERSEW (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.26, P = .71). Conclusions: Relative to an NT staple line, the use of OVERSEW or BUTTRESS can decrease the rates of POB by up to 30%. The use of these techniques should be strongly considered by the bariatric surgeon.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2018.00056en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSociety of Laparoendoscopic Surgeonsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
dc.subjectBariatric surgeryen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.titleStaple Line Treatment and Bleeding After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4293/JSLS.2018.00056
dc.identifier.pmid30607100


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record