An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Detect Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Based on Spatial Pattern Analysis
JournalInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science
PublisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPurpose: To detect visual field (VF) progression by analyzing spatial pattern changes. Methods: We selected 12,217 eyes from 7360 patients with at least five reliable 24-2 VFs and 5 years of follow-up with an interval of at least 6 months. VFs were decomposed into 16 archetype patterns previously derived by artificial intelligence techniques. Linear regressions were applied to the 16 archetype weights of VF series over time. We defined progression as the decrease rate of the normal archetype or any increase rate of the 15 VF defect archetypes to be outside normal limits. The archetype method was compared with mean deviation (MD) slope, Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) scoring, Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) scoring, and the permutation of pointwise linear regression (PoPLR), and was validated by a subset of VFs assessed by three glaucoma specialists. Results: In the method development cohort of 11,817 eyes, the archetype method agreed more with MD slope (kappa: 0.37) and PoPLR (0.33) than AGIS (0.12) and CIGTS (0.22). The most frequently progressed patterns included decreased normal pattern (63.7%), and increased nasal steps (16.4%), altitudinal loss (15.9%), superior-peripheral defect (12.1%), paracentral/central defects (10.5%), and near total loss (10.4%). In the clinical validation cohort of 397 eyes with 27.5% of confirmed progression, the agreement (kappa) and accuracy (mean of hit rate and correct rejection rate) of the archetype method (0.51 and 0.77) significantly (P < 0.001 for all) outperformed AGIS (0.06 and 0.52), CIGTS (0.24 and 0.59), MD slope (0.21 and 0.59), and PoPLR (0.26 and 0.60). Conclusions: The archetype method can inform clinicians of VF progression patterns.
Keywordspatial pattern analysis
Visual Field Tests--methods
Visual Field Tests--statistics & numerical data
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85060529303&doi=10.1167%2fiovs.18-25568&partnerID=40&md5=3c77dd1d1e326ac156968b4b9494378f; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/8699
- More Accurate Modeling of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma: ANSWERS.
- Authors: Zhu H, Crabb DP, Ho T, Garway-Heath DF
- Issue date: 2015 Sep
- Comparison of Methods to Detect and Measure Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression.
- Authors: Rabiolo A, Morales E, Mohamed L, Capistrano V, Kim JH, Afifi A, Yu F, Coleman AL, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment.
- Authors: Katz J
- Issue date: 1999 Feb
- Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
- Authors: Wang M, Pasquale LR, Shen LQ, Boland MV, Wellik SR, De Moraes CG, Myers JS, Wang H, Baniasadi N, Li D, Silva RNE, Bex PJ, Elze T
- Issue date: 2018 Mar
- Visual field progression in glaucoma: estimating the overall significance of deterioration with permutation analyses of pointwise linear regression (PoPLR).
- Authors: O'Leary N, Chauhan BC, Artes PH
- Issue date: 2012 Oct 1