• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Opportunities to implement a sustainable genomic medicine program: lessons learned from the IGNITE Network

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Levy, K.D.
    Blake, K.
    Fletcher-Hoppe, C.
    Date
    2019
    Journal
    Genetics in Medicine
    Publisher
    Nature Publishing Group
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0080-y
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0280-5
    Abstract
    Purpose: While there is growing scientific evidence for and significant advances in the use of genomic technologies in medicine, there is a significant lag in the clinical adoption and sustainability of genomic medicine. Here we describe the findings from the National Human Genome Research Institute's (NHGRI) Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) Network in identifying key constructs, opportunities, and challenges associated with driving sustainability of genomic medicine in clinical practice. Methods: Network members and affiliates were surveyed to identify key drivers associated with implementing and sustaining a genomic medicine program. Tallied results were used to develop and weigh key constructs/drivers required to support sustainability of genomic medicine programs. Results: The top three driver-stakeholder dyads were (1) genomic training for providers, (2) genomic clinical decision support (CDS) tools embedded in the electronic health record (EHR), and (3) third party reimbursement for genomic testing. Conclusion: Priorities may differ depending on healthcare systems when comparing the current state of key drivers versus projected needs for supporting genomic medicine sustainability. Thus we provide gap-filling guidance based on IGNITE members' experiences. Although results are limited to findings from the IGNITE network, their implementation, scientific, and clinical experience may be used as a road map by others considering implementing genomic medicine programs. Copyright 2018, The Author(s).
    Description
    The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, which was incorrectly given as Geoffrey Ginsburg. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article. DOI 10.1038/s41436-018-0280-5
    Keyword
    genomic education
    IGNITE Network
    sustainability
    Genomics
    Implementation Science
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049676333&doi=10.1038%2fs41436-018-0080-y&partnerID=40&md5=fa440ba2f0573714ca116b205aef5092; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/8697
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1038/s41436-018-0080-y
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • What will it take to implement genomics in practice? Lessons from the IGNITE Network.
    • Authors: Ginsburg GS, Horowitz CR, Orlando LA
    • Issue date: 2019 Jul
    • Implementing genomics and pharmacogenomics in the clinic: The National Human Genome Research Institute's genomic medicine portfolio.
    • Authors: Manolio TA
    • Issue date: 2016 Oct
    • Challenges and strategies for implementing genomic services in diverse settings: experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network.
    • Authors: Sperber NR, Carpenter JS, Cavallari LH, J Damschroder L, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Denny JC, Ginsburg GS, Guan Y, Horowitz CR, Levy KD, Levy MA, Madden EB, Matheny ME, Pollin TI, Pratt VM, Rosenman M, Voils CI, W Weitzel K, Wilke RA, Ryanne Wu R, Orlando LA
    • Issue date: 2017 May 22
    • Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records.
    • Authors: Hartzler A, McCarty CA, Rasmussen LV, Williams MS, Brilliant M, Bowton EA, Clayton EW, Faucett WA, Ferryman K, Field JR, Fullerton SM, Horowitz CR, Koenig BA, McCormick JB, Ralston JD, Sanderson SC, Smith ME, Trinidad SB
    • Issue date: 2013 Oct
    • Development of a Genomic Data Flow Framework: Results of a Survey Administered to NIH-NHGRI IGNITE and eMERGE Consortia Participants.
    • Authors: Dexter P, Ong H, Elsey A, Bell G, Walton N, Chung W, Rasmussen L, Hicks K, Owusu-Obeng A, Scott S, Ellis S, Peterson J
    • Issue date: 2019
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.