Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDayucos, A.
dc.contributor.authorFrench, L.A.
dc.contributor.authorKelemen, A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-29T14:42:01Z
dc.date.available2019-03-29T14:42:01Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85060944436&doi=10.3390%2fmedicina55020032&partnerID=40&md5=587a0998f74f9a0b5f7b24a1ce6fb236
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/8581
dc.description.abstractThe use of websites to provide patient education is becoming more common. The benefits of a properly executed and effective preoperative patient educational intervention have been shown to result in improved psychological and physical well-being for patients undergoing surgery. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the usability, utility, and feasibility of a website we created to increase engagement and improve the quality of the preoperative education patients receive in preparation for hip and knee arthroplasty. Eighty patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited, aged between 40 to 65, among those 52.5% were female, 71.25% were placed for knee replacement, 28.75% for hip replacement. Forty patients were randomly assigned to paper education cohort, 40 to the paper and website education cohort. However, only 19 from each cohort participated in the survey questionnaire. The outcome of interest included qualitative data for patient knowledge, satisfaction, utilities, and usability, which were assessed based on the Perceived Health Website Usability Questionnaire online survey. The paper-based survey contains ten questions using a 7-point Likert scale while the web-based survey contains fourteen questions using the same 7-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests were used for comparative analysis of usual paper education and website education cohorts; whereby Microsoft Excel data analytics tool was used to compute the results. The Alpha level was set to 0.05 for the statistical results. The result of the study showed no statistically significant differences in both cohorts at the 0.05 level. We hypothesized that both information delivery methods were effective in increasing knowledge and engaging patients to their preoperative educations. According to the survey result for the nursing staff, they believed that the use of the website improved nursing workflow, efficiency, and patient education.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55020032en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.subjectusabilityen_US
dc.subjectwebsiteen_US
dc.subject.lcshEducationen_US
dc.subject.meshArthroplastyen_US
dc.titleCreation and Evaluation of a Preoperative Education Website for Hip and Knee Replacement Patients-A Pilot Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/medicina55020032
dc.identifier.pmid30704149


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record