Letter from the Working Group of the American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare to Richard P. Barth on September 22, 2009
MetadataShow full item record
DescriptionLetter from Grover C. Gilmore, PhD, on behalf of The Working Group of the American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare, to Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW, sent on September 22, 2009. The letter notified Dr. Barth that he was to be inducted as part of the inaugural class of fellows and the initial Board of Directors for the American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare. This was to be publicly announced at the Opening Ceremony of the Annual Program Meeting for the Council on Social Work Education on November 6, 2009. The mission of the newly formed Academy is stated in the letter as well.
KeywordAmerican Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare
board of directors
Barth, Richard P., 1952-
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/7465
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
1968: The Turning Point Year When U.S. Social Work Failed to TurnReisch, Michael, 1948- (2018-03)The year 1968 was a potential turning point in the history of U.S. social work. After a generation of inward looking conservatism, significant numbers of American social workers revived the radical tradition of the profession that the purges of the post-war McCarthy period had repressed. New social movements, particularly the civil rights movement, the anti-war movement, and second wave feminism, and the efforts of activists outside of social work, from Saul Alinsky and Cesar Chavez to the National Welfare Rights Organization, inspired new approaches to advocacy, research, practice, and education. Inside and outside professional organizations and social service agencies, social workers began to advocate for progressive policies, the use of more expansive and more democratic practice frameworks, and the inclusion of content on race, gender, class, and sexuality in social work education. For a brief period, it appeared that a major transformation of the profession was possible, even inevitable. Although the events of this critical year produced some important changes in social work practice and education, they did not change its fundamental orientation. Ironically, both the ultimate failure of the era’s radical activism and the introduction of identity-based content into the profession’s vocabulary and mission made U.S. social work more vulnerable to conservative attacks during the past half century. The developments that resulted from the “year of the barricades” also made it more difficult for the profession to articulate a unified vision for a rapidly changing environment and to translate that vision into new models of practice, research, and education.