Is this trial misreported? Truth seeking in the burgeoning age of trial transparency
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
MetadataShow full item record
DescriptionOne group’s efforts to monitor misreporting of outcomes has irritated several medical journals, which argue that the differences discovered are not clinically important. So how seriously should we be taking it? Peter Doshi reports.
CitationDoshi, P. (2016). Is this trial misreported? Truth seeking in the burgeoning age of trial transparency. BMJ 2016;355:i5543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5543
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/6604
- Protocol review at The Lancet.
- Authors: McNamee D, James A, Kleinert S
- Issue date: 2008 Jul 19
- Registration status and outcome reporting of trials published in core headache medicine journals.
- Authors: Rayhill ML, Sharon R, Burch R, Loder E
- Issue date: 2015 Nov 17
- From quality of publication to quality of care: translating trials to practice.
- Authors: Dancey JE
- Issue date: 2010 May 19
- Toward Fairness in Data Sharing.
- Authors: International Consortium of Investigators for Fairness in Trial Data Sharing., Devereaux PJ, Guyatt G, Gerstein H, Connolly S, Yusuf S
- Issue date: 2016 Aug 4
- Letter to the editor, "Clinical trial registration in oral health journals".
- Authors: Saltaji H, Flores-Mir C, Major PW
- Issue date: 2015 Mar