Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDoshi, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T18:54:49Z
dc.date.available2017-05-24T18:54:49Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-16
dc.identifier.citationDoshi, P. (2015). No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine trial reanalysis raises questions about insitutional responsibility. BMJ, 351. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4629
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/6591
dc.descriptionAs new data analysis adds weight to calls for retraction of a paper on paroxetine in adolescents, the author examines the resistance to action of a professional society, its journal, and an Ivy League university
dc.description.urihttp://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/bmj.h4629?ijkey=00ZjcBlMGct6aDR&keytype=ref
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectRestoring Invisible and Abandoned Trialsen_US
dc.subjectRIATen_US
dc.subjectStudy 329en_US
dc.subject.lcshAmerican Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatryen_US
dc.subject.lcshBrown Universityen_US
dc.subject.lcshGlaxoSmithKlineen_US
dc.subject.lcshPharmaceutical industry--Corrupt practicesen_US
dc.subject.meshClinical Trials as Topic--ethicsen_US
dc.subject.meshConflict of Interesten_US
dc.subject.meshDrug Industry--ethicsen_US
dc.subject.meshParoxetineen_US
dc.subject.meshEthics, Institutionalen_US
dc.subject.meshDrug Evaluation--ethicsen_US
dc.titleNo correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine trial reanalysis raises questions about institutional responsibilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.h4629
dc.identifier.pmid26377109
dc.identifier.ispublishedNoen_US
dc.description.urinameClick here for the free full-text article on publisher’s websiteen_US
refterms.dateFOA2019-02-19T18:15:24Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Doshi_BMJ_No_Correction.pdf
Size:
529.4Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record