People With Secrets: Contesting, Constructing, and Resisting Women’s Claims About Sexualized Victimization
dc.contributor.author | Corrigan, Rose | |
dc.contributor.author | Shdaimah, Corey S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-23T18:10:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-23T18:10:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Corrigan, R., Shdaimah, C. S. (2016). People With Secrets: Contesting, Constructing, and Resisting Women’s Claims About Sexualized Victimization. Catholic University Law Review, 65(3). | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10713/6261 | |
dc.description.tableofcontents | I. HOW CRIMINAL JUSTICE PERSONNEL RECOGNIZE VICTIMS... 436 A. Ideal Victim Theory and Case Outcomes... 437 1. The Power of Ideal Victim Theory... 437 2. The Limitations of Ideal Victim Theory ... 437 B. Applying Ideal Victim Theory to Women Affected by Sexual Offenses... 440 1. Prostitute Women and Ideal Victim Theory ... 440 2. Sexual Assault Victims and Ideal Victim Theory... 445 C. The Arena of Intelligibility as an Alternative Explanation .... 446 II. METHODOLOGY... 455 III. CREATING VICTIMS... 458 A. Responses to Questioning .... 458 B. Demonstrations of Compliance... 467 C. Representing Trauma... 473 D. Why (and How) Intelligibility Matters... 480 IV. CONCLUSION... 484 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Washington D.C.: Catholic University | en_US |
dc.subject | arena of intelligibility | en_US |
dc.subject | sexual assault victims | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Sex crimes--Investigation | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Sex discrimination in criminal justice administration | en_US |
dc.title | People With Secrets: Contesting, Constructing, and Resisting Women’s Claims About Sexualized Victimization | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.uriname | Full Text | en_US |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-02-20T14:15:36Z |