The Effect of Variants in Five Genes in the Glucagon Pathway on Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Diabetes-Related Traits
MetadataShow full item record
Other TitlesThe Effect of Variants in 5 Genes in the Glucagon Pathway on Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Diabetes-Related Traits
AbstractThe CDC estimates that 29.1 million Americans have type 2 diabetes, which is currently the seventh leading cause of death in the US. It has been proposed that disordered glucagon regulation is a major contributor to the diabetic phenotype. We hypothesized that variants in five genes in the glucagon pathway are associated with response of diabetes-related glucose, insulin, and body composition traits to three antidiabetic interventions in the DPP and that rare coding variants would be enriched compared to other populations and associated with type 2 diabetes and diabetes-related traits in the Old Order Amish (OOA). We have discovered an association between the GCG variant, rs5649, that is predicted to modify the consensus splice site, with increased baseline-adjusted fasting glucose at one year in the metformin and placebo groups but not in the other two treatment groups, suggesting that it may change the structure of glucagon and decrease the ability of metformin to reduce glucagon signaling. We have performed the only known study of a PCSK2 coding variant common in any population. We found this variant, R430W, and the GCGR variant D458H to be twice as common among OOA individuals with diabetes as those with normal or impaired glucose tolerance, although this difference is not statistically significant. In addition, we examined the relationship between the GCGR coding variant G40S and type 2 diabetes risk that has been previously reported and did not see an association despite being better powered than previous studies because of the increased allele frequency of 14% in the OOA population. Finally, we described the only reported GCGR G40S homozygotes, none of whom have type 2 diabetes. In sum, we have provided data on the effects of variants in five genes in the glucagon pathway that can be used in future work to understand the contribution of the glucagon pathway to type 2 diabetes and to inform the development of antidiabetic treatments targeting this pathway.
DescriptionUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore. Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. Ph.D. 2016
Keyworddiabetes prevention program
Old Order Amish
prohormone convertase 2
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/5464
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Development of autoimmune diabetes with severe diabetic ketoacidosis and immune-related thyroiditis secondary to durvalumab: a case report.Lopes, Ana Rita; Russo, Alessandro; Li, Andrew Y; McCusker, Michael G; Kroopnick, Jeffrey Myles; Scilla, Katherine; Mehra, Ranee; Rolfo, Christian (AME Publishing Company, 2020-10)Immune-mediated endocrinopathies are among the most frequent immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1)/PD-1. However, the development of auto-immune diabetes is an uncommon event during PD(L)-1 blockade, either as monotherapy or in combination therapy. Here we report a case of a 75-year-old male with a mediastinal recurrence from a stage IA squamous cell carcinoma of the lung previously treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) who early developed a severe diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) caused by new-onset auto-immune diabetes, with positive glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) autoantibodies, during durvalumab consolidation therapy after concurrent chemoradiation. The patient had no personal or family history of diabetes or auto-immune diseases and was admitted after the second cycle of durvalumab to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe DKA. During his hospitalization, insulin and fluid therapy were started and the patient had a favorable clinical course. Durvalumab treatment was interrupted and thyroiditis was verified during follow-up, without anti-thyroid antibodies, that progressed to subsequent hypothyroidism with need of thyroid hormone replacement therapy. This case highlights the rare irAE of autoimmune type 1 diabetes during anti-PD(L)-1 therapy, which can be life-threatening and requires adequate patient education and prompt medical treatment within a multidisciplinary team, including endocrinology and emergency medicine. Besides its low incidence, this case show how irAE must be taken in account about decision of ICI treatment, especially in curative setting, as they can be potentially fatal and impair overall survival. Furthermore, as reported in the present case, multiple endocrine irAEs can occur in the same patient either simultaneously or sequentially, suggesting that active surveillance is needed in those who develop endocrinopathies as a result of ICI treatment. Immune-mediated endocrinopathies are generally irreversible and cause life-long morbidity, which must be taken into consideration when deciding on further lines of treatment.
How to Best Protect People With Diabetes From the Impact of SARS-CoV-2: Report of the International COVID-19 and Diabetes SummitZhang, Jennifer Y; Shang, Trisha; Ahn, David; Chen, Kong; Coté, Gerard; Espinoza, Juan; Mendez, Carlos E; Spanakis, Elias K; Thompson, Bithika; Wallia, Amisha; et al. (SAGE Publications Inc., 2021-01-21)The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has rapidly involved the entire world and exposed the pressing need for collaboration between public health and other stakeholders from the clinical, scientific, regulatory, pharmaceutical, and medical device and technology communities. To discuss how to best protect people with diabetes from serious outcomes from COVID-19, Diabetes Technology Society, in collaboration with Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, hosted the “International COVID-19 and Diabetes Virtual Summit” on August 26-27, 2020. This unique, unprecedented real-time conference brought together physicians, scientists, government officials, regulatory experts, industry representatives, and people with diabetes from six continents to review and analyze relationships between COVID-19 and diabetes. Over 800 attendees logged in. The summit consisted of five sessions: (I) Keynotes, (II) Preparedness, (III) Response, (IV) Recovery, and (V) Surveillance; eight parts: (A) Background, (B) Resilience, (C) Outpatient Care, (D) Inpatient Care, (E) Resources, (F) High-Risk Groups, (G) Regulation, and (H) The Future; and 24 sections: (1) Historic Pandemics and Impact on Society, (2) Pathophysiology/Risk Factors for COVID-19, (3) Social Determinants of COVID-19, (4) Preparing for the Future, (5) Medications and Vaccines, (6) Psychology of Patients and Caregivers, (7) Outpatient Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus and Non-Pharmacologic Intervention, (8) Technology and Telehealth for Diabetes Outpatients, (9) Technology for Inpatients, (10) Management of Diabetes Inpatients with COVID-19, (11) Ethics, (12) Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests, (13) Children, (14) Pregnancy, (15) Economics of Care for COVID-19, (16) Role of Industry, (17) Protection of Healthcare Workers, (18) People with Diabetes, (19) International Responses to COVID-19, (20) Government Policy, (21) Regulation of Tests and Treatments, (22) Digital Health Technology, (23) Big Data Statistics, and 24) Patient Surveillance and Privacy. The two keynote speeches were entitled (1) COVID-19 and Diabetes—Meeting the Challenge and (2) Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities for Diabetes and COVID-19. While there was an emphasis on diabetes and its interactions with COVID-19, the panelists also discussed the COVID-19 pandemic in general. The meeting generated many novel ideas for collaboration between experts in medicine, science, government, and industry to develop new technologies and disease treatment paradigms to fight this global pandemic.
Can treating oral inflammation lead to the reduction in a systemic outcome? A systematic review looking into pregnancy and diabetes.Guy, Veronica; Oates, Thomas W. (2018)The contribution of periodontal disease to the development of adverse systemic consequences remains controversial. It is hypothesized that inconsistencies between studies is due in part to limitations in study design. This review assessed systemic conditions including adverse pregnancy outcomes and glycemic control for patients with diabetes in a combined manner based on a shared inflammatory mechanism of consequence. It is thought that the systemic consequences of periodontal inflammation can directly influence these systemic conditions. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the consideration of the patients' medical management during the study and also the number of study participants as two important factors influencing the study outcomes. An article search was performed using OVID Medline, Cochrane library and EMBASE and a manual search was performed through November 2017. Randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2017 looking into the effectiveness of periodontal therapy on the rate of pre-term birth in a pregnant population and on glycated hemoglobin A1c in a type 2 diabetics were included. Primary outcomes were changes in HbA1c and differences in frequency of occurrence of pre-term birth. Medical management of the systemic condition under study was categorized from 0-3, based on stringency of study design and consideration for medical management during study participation. Risk of bias regarding randomization, allocation of sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting and other biases were averaged using a cumulative assessment of factors considered in prior systematic reviews with shared studies. After article selection, randomized controlled trials including 17 on diabetes and 13 on pregnancy were combined for evaluation. Both increased sample size (R2=0.09, R value = 0.3) and improved stringency of medical management (Figures 13 & 14) were associated with diminished effects of periodontal therapy on systemic outcomes. Interestingly, risk of bias as assessed in previous systematic reviews showed a modest correlation (R2=0.104, R value= 0.32) with primary outcomes. This systematic review demonstrates that the disparate results in studies of periodontal therapy affecting systemic outcomes may be explained in part by study design, specifically stringency in consideration of medical management and sample size. The potential for confounding factors influencing outcomes remains a concern.