Browsing School of Dentistry by Subject "radiographs"
Now showing items 1-3 of 3
The Differences in Panoramic Bone Density Between Bisphosphonates (BPs) Patients With, Without, or at Risk for Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ)Background: Since late 2003, there have been numerous reports in the literature illustrating the association between bisphosphonate use and the appearance of avascular necrosis of the jaws. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) represents a growing concern for oral- and maxillofacial practice. Although many studies have been conducted in recent years evaluating the early manifestations of BRONJ, a clearer understanding of the significance of early radiographic alterations could improve the identification of patients at increased risk of this disease and may help to guide interventions. The purpose of this study is to compare the bone density of the posterior mandible in the panoramic radiographs of patients with BRONJ, patients who received bisphosphonate therapy and did not develop BRONJ, patients who received bisphosphonate therapy and eventually developed BRONJ, and controls. Materials and Methods: A convenience sample, consisted of 54 digital panoramic radiographs was divided in to four groups. Group 1 represented controls i.e. patients that have never been exposed to bisphosphonates of any kind and Group 2 represented the "at risk patients" i.e. received bisphosphonates but never developed BRONJ. Group 3A consists of early panoramic radiographs of patients who are on bisphosphonate therapy but at that time did not develop BRONJ. Group 3B is the BRONJ group, including those of 3A that went on to develop BRONJ and subjects that presented with BRONJ. The radiographs were evaluated using Planmeca Romexis software fully supported for radiographs were evaluated using Planmeca Romexis software fully supported for Windows operating system. The minimum and maximum density, averages and SD of the bone at the angle of the mandible on the right and the left sides were compared using ttest. Results: There was no significant difference in bone density of the digital panoramic radiographs between patients at risk of BRONJ, having BRONJ, and normal patients. Although the data is not significant, the findings indicate a clear trend whereas the minimum and maximum densities are highest in individuals taking BPs and these values decline as BRONJ develops, as compared with the controls. Conclusion: More studies are required to definitively determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of simple radiographic imaging as relates to the problem of BRONJ.
Panoramic Bone Density in the Posterior Mandible in Patients with, without, or at risk of developing Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ)Early radiographic changes of MRONJ could help in identifying patients at increased risk of developing the disease. This study compared and contrasted bone density in the posterior mandible of patients with, without, or at risk of developing MRONJ. This was a retrospective study of 46 patients (18 with MRONJ, 20 at risk but without MRONJ, and 8 controls with no exposure to MRONJ associated drugs). ImageJ software was used for bone density evaluation of the radiographs. Bone density was significantly higher in MRONJ patients when compared to at risk patients and controls. In a sub-cohort of patients with MRONJ where we had pre- and post-MRONJ images, the density was significantly higher in the pre-MRONJ radiographs when compared to after MRONJ radiographs and also higher than the at risk radiographs (p-value = 0.03). ImageJ analysis of the panoramic radiographs was successful in detecting significant differences in bone density in our sample.
Prevalence of Atypical Radiographic Findings in Bitewings of Class II Composite Restorations: Detection and Assessment of Radiolucent AreasThis retrospective study aimed to describe the prevalence of radiographic abnormalities in bitewing radiographs of proximal class II composite restorations. Bitewing radiographs of proximal composite restorations of adult patients who underwent restorative care at predoctoral clinics at the University of Maryland School of Dentistry from August 2014 to July 2016 were identified. Atypical radiographic features were categorized by type of material and location. The information recorded for patients included age, sex, tooth, and restored surface. Out of the 669 examined restorations, 16.5% radiographs showed no atypical radiographic findings and 83.5% restorations had unusual radiographic signs. The types of atypical radiographic findings were distributed as 16.5% internal voids, 3% overhang, 7.8% interlayer lines, 12.6% secondary caries, 20.7% interfacial gaps and 23.1% had multiple atypical findings. There is high prevalence of atypical radiographic findings in class II composite restorations, particularly in the body of the composite, premolars, and disto-occlusal restorations.