Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNezami, Nariman
dc.contributor.authorMijnte van Breugel, Johanna Maria
dc.contributor.authorKonstantindis, Menelaos
dc.contributor.authorChapiro, Julius
dc.contributor.authorSavic, Lynn Jeanette
dc.contributor.authorMiszczuk, Milena Anna
dc.contributor.authorRexha, Irvin
dc.contributor.authorLin, Mingde
dc.contributor.authorHong, Kelvin
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiades, Christos
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-16T18:57:17Z
dc.date.available2023-11-16T18:57:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/21110
dc.descriptionThe article processing charges (APC) for this open access article were partially funded by the Health Sciences and Human Services Library's Open Access Publishing Fund for Early-Career Researchers.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aim: Lipiodol is the key component of conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization. Our aim was to evaluate lipiodol deposition and washout rate after conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatic metastases originating from neuroendocrine tumors and colorectal carcinoma. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 44 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and liver metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors or colorectal carcinoma who underwent conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization. Lipiodol volume (cm3) was analyzed on non-contrast computed tomography imaging obtained within 24 h post conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization, and 40-220 days after conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization using volumetric image analysis software. Tumor response was assessed on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging 1 month after conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization. Results: The washout rate was longer for neuroendocrine tumors compared to colorectal carcinoma, with half-lives of 54.61 days (p<0.00001) and 19.39 days (p<0.001), respectively, with no exponential washout among intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (p=0.83). The half-life for lipiodol washout was longer in tumors larger than 300 cm3 compared to smaller tumors (25.43 vs. 22.71 days). Lipiodol wash out half-life was 54.76 days (p<0.01) and 29.45 days (p<0.00001) for tumors with a contrast enhancement burden of 60% or more and less than 60%, respectively. A negative exponential relationship for lipiodol washout was observed in nonresponders (p<0.00001). Conclusion: Lipiodol washout is a time-dependent process, and occurs faster in colorectal carcinoma tumors, tumors smaller than 300 cm3, tumors with baseline contrast enhancement burden of less than 60%, and non-responding target lesions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofin vivoen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.lcshColon (Anatomy)--Canceren_US
dc.subject.lcshRectum--Canceren_US
dc.subject.meshEthiodized Oilen_US
dc.subject.meshChemoembolization, Therapeuticen_US
dc.subject.meshCholangiocarcinomaen_US
dc.subject.meshNeuroendocrine Tumorsen_US
dc.titleLipiodol Deposition and Washout in Primary and Metastatic Liver Tumors After Chemoembolizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-11-16T18:57:18Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Nezami_Nariman_APC_2021.pdf
Size:
2.349Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International