The UMB Digital Archive is getting an upgrade! The upgrade requires a content freeze starting 1/27/25 and is expected to last two weeks. Any new user accounts or submissions made to the Archive during this time will not be transferred to the upgraded site. Contact ArchiveHelp@hshsl.umaryland.edu for questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWrich, James T.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T15:46:13Z
dc.date.available2023-05-01T15:46:13Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/20507
dc.description.abstractMany organizations have estimated the benefit to cost ratio of their EAP. An important factor in developing such ratios is the cost and effectiveness of mental health and chemical dependency treatment. If such treatment is overpriced or ineffective, the BCR will be adversely affected. Besides treatment costs, the formula also includes the cost of the EAP’s operation plus cost of time off to get treatment versus the cost of sick leave pre/post program use.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEAPen_US
dc.subject.lcshEmployee assistance programsen_US
dc.subject.meshMental Healthen_US
dc.subject.meshSubstance-Related Disordersen_US
dc.subject.meshCost-Benefit Analysisen_US
dc.titleThe Benefit to Cost Impact of EAPsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ispublishedNoen_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-05-01T15:46:14Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The Benefit to Cost Impact of ...
Size:
124.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
article

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International