Barriers and facilitators to technology transfer of NIDILRR grantees
Author
Higgins, ErinZorrilla, Michelle
Murphy, Kathleen M.
Robertson, Megan
Goldberg, Mary R.
Cohen, Susan K.
Augustine, Nancy
Pearlman, Jonathan L.
Date
2022-09-22Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive TechnologyType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: The objectives of this mixed-methods study were to gather survey and interview data about the barriers and facilitators from grantees funded by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) and to extract themes that could inform program changes that would increase technology translation (TT) success in assistive technology (AT). Materials and methods: We developed a TT Barriers and Facilitators survey consisting of Likert scale and multiple-choice questions about barriers and facilitators to TT. With survey respondents who were willing, we conducting a semi-structured interview and asked pointed questions to expand upon survey response rankings and perceived barriers and facilitators. The questions were framed to explore the grantee’s personal experience with ATTT and what helped and hindered their individualised processes. Results: Across survey and interview respondents, the three most common themes when exploring the barriers and facilitators of TT were funding, incentives, and collaboration. Conclusions: Results indicate that there is a need for increased collaboration and access to additional resources such as funding for pilot grants, support to assess technology marketability, help to navigate regulatory and legal aspects, and assistance in establishing goals to help grantees successfully transfer assistive technologies to consumers. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION A large amount of research and development into assistive technology does not lead to tech transfer which means that these technologies are not getting to the people that need them. Educating tech transfer offices at universities about how to transfer AT would improve outcomes greatly. Creating a community of practice where grantees can find academic or industry partners would also increase the likelihood of tech transfer. Some tools to catalyse these improvements are: mentoring, access to consultants, podcasts, and online training. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Sponsors
U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesIdentifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/20013ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/17483107.2022.2122604