• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Comparison Study of Diagnosis and Treatment Planning for Dental Infections between Dental Students and Practitioners.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Oh, Se-Lim
    Jones, Deborah
    Kim, Jong Ryul
    Choi, Seung Kee
    Chung, Man-Kyo
    Date
    2022-07-26
    Journal
    Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
    Publisher
    MDPI AG
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081393
    Abstract
    This study aimed to access the knowledge in diagnosing dental infections and the practice in treatment planning for the affected teeth among dental practitioners (DPs) and senior (final-year) students. A survey questionnaire containing two cases (Case A; periodontal abscess and Case B; periapical abscess) with four questions per case was delivered to potential participants. Fifty-nine DPs voluntarily participated in the survey. For senior students, the case study was a part of their course requirements; one of the two cases (either Case A or B) was randomly assigned to the 126 seniors. The distribution of responses was significantly different between the DP and senior groups except for the diagnosis of Case B (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.05). Only 31% of the participants diagnosed Case A as periodontal abscess; most of them selected periodontal surgery as the first treatment option. Despite a high agreement in diagnosing Case B, the choice of treatment was significantly different; the most frequent treatment option was extraction (51%) from the DP group and root canal retreatment (57%) from the senior group. The study revealed that the diagnosis of periodontal abscess was more challenging than that of periapical abscess among dental professionals.
    Keyword
    differential diagnosis
    education
    periapical abscess
    periodontal abscess
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/19494
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.3390/healthcare10081393
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Outcome of single- versus two-visit root canal retreatment in teeth with periapical lesions: A randomized clinical trial.
    • Authors: Karaoğlan F, Miçooğulları Kurt S, Çalışkan MK
    • Issue date: 2022 Aug
    • Factors influencing root canal retreatment strategies by general practitioners and specialists in Australia.
    • Authors: Wenteler GL, Sathorn C, Parashos P
    • Issue date: 2015 May
    • The new periodontal disease classification: Level of agreement on diagnoses and treatment planning at various dental education levels.
    • Authors: Abou-Arraj RV, Kaur M, Alkhoury S, Swain TA, Geurs NC, Souccar NM
    • Issue date: 2021 Oct
    • Antibiotic prescribing for endodontic therapies: a comparative survey between general dental practitioners and final year Bachelor of Dental Surgery students in Cardiff, UK.
    • Authors: Al Masan AA, Dummer PMH, Farnell DJJ, Vianna ME
    • Issue date: 2018 Jul
    • On implementation of an endodontic program.
    • Authors: Koch M
    • Issue date: 2013
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.