Bloodstream Infections in Hematologic Malignancy Patients With Fever and Neutropenia: Are Empirical Antibiotic Therapies in the United States Still Effective?
Author
Zimmer, Andrea JStohs, Erica
Meza, Jane
Arnold, Christopher
Baddley, John W
Chandrasekar, Pranatharthi
El Boghdadly, Zeinab
Gomez, Carlos A
Maziarz, Eileen K
Montoya, Jose G
Pergam, Steven
Rolston, Kenneth V
Satlin, Michael J
Satyanarayana, Gowri
Shoham, Shmuel
Strasfeld, Lynne
Taplitz, Randy
Walsh, Thomas J
Young, Jo-Anne H
Zhang, Yuning
Freifeld, Alison G
Date
2022-05-18Journal
Open Forum Infectious DiseasesPublisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Rising antimicrobial resistance rates may impact the efficacy of empirical antibiotic treatment for febrile neutropenia in high-risk cancer patients. Lacking contemporary data about the epidemiology, antibiotic resistance patterns, and clinical outcomes from bloodstream infections (BSIs) in US cancer patients, it is unclear if current guidelines remain relevant. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 14 US cancer centers prospectively identified BSIs in high-risk febrile neutropenic (FN) patients, including those receiving chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Results: Among 389 organisms causing BSI in 343 patients, there was an equal distribution of gram-negative (GN) and gram-positive (GP) bacteria, with variability across centers. Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam were the most commonly prescribed empirical antibiotics for FN, at 62% and 23%, respectively; a GP-directed agent was empirically included in nearly half of all FN episodes within the first 24 hours. Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenems was 49%, 84%, 88%, and 96%, respectively, among GN isolates. Critical illness (CrI), defined as a new requirement for mechanical ventilation, vasopressor, or death within 30 days, occurred in 15% and did not correlate with fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, organism type, initial antibiotics, or adequacy of coverage. Only severity of illness at presentation, signified by a Pitt bacteremia score ≥2, predicted for critical illness within 30 days. Mortality was 4% by day 7 and 10% overall. Conclusions: In accordance with US guidelines, cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam remain effective agents or empirical treatment for high-risk cancer patients with FN who are stable at presentation, maintaining high GN pathogen susceptibility and yielding excellent outcomes.Keyword
bacteremia following chemotherapybacteremia in cancer patients
bloodstream infections
empirical antibiotics
febrile neutropenia
Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/19427ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/ofid/ofac240
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Related articles
- Third generation cephalosporin resistant Enterobacteriaceae and multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria causing bacteremia in febrile neutropenia adult cancer patients in Lebanon, broad spectrum antibiotics use as a major risk factor, and correlation with poor prognosis.
- Authors: Moghnieh R, Estaitieh N, Mugharbil A, Jisr T, Abdallah DI, Ziade F, Sinno L, Ibrahim A
- Issue date: 2015
- A single-center evaluation of the risk for colonization or bacteremia with piperacillin-tazobactam- and cefepime-resistant bacteria in patients with acute leukemia receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis.
- Authors: Nguyen AD, Heil EL, Patel NK, Duffy A, Gilmore S
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies.
- Authors: Bow EJ, Rotstein C, Noskin GA, Laverdiere M, Schwarer AP, Segal BH, Seymour JF, Szer J, Sanche S
- Issue date: 2006 Aug 15
- Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial.
- Authors: Sanz MA, López J, Lahuerta JJ, Rovira M, Batlle M, Pérez C, Vázquez L, Julià A, Palau J, Gutiérrez M, Capote FJ, Ramos F, Benlloch L, Larrea L, Jarque I, Spanish PETHEMA Group
- Issue date: 2002 Jul
- Antibiotic rotation for febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: clinical significance of antibiotic heterogeneity.
- Authors: Chong Y, Shimoda S, Yakushiji H, Ito Y, Miyamoto T, Kamimura T, Shimono N, Akashi K
- Issue date: 2013