• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Discrepancy Between Invasive and Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients with Sepsis by Vasopressor Status.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Tran, Quincy K
    Gelmann, Dominique
    Alam, Zain
    Beher, Richa
    Engelbrecht-Wiggans, Emily
    Fairchild, Matthew
    Hart, Emily
    Hollis, Grace
    Karwoski, Allison
    Palmer, Jamie
    Raffman, Alison
    Haase, Daniel J
    Show allShow less

    Date
    2022-05-05
    Journal
    Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Publisher
    University of California Press
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2022.1.53211
    Abstract
    West J Emerg Med. 2022 May 5;23(3):358-367. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.1.53211. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Blood pressure (BP) monitoring is an essential component of sepsis management. The Surviving Sepsis Guidelines recommend invasive arterial BP (IABP) monitoring, although the benefits over non-invasive BP (NIBP) monitoring are unclear. This study investigated discrepancies between IABP and NIBP measurement and their clinical significance. We hypothesized that IABP monitoring would be associated with changes in management among patients with sepsis requiring vasopressors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adult patients admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit at a quaternary medical center between January 1-December 31, 2017. We included patients with sepsis conditions AND IABP monitoring. We defined a clinically significant BP discrepancy (BPD) between NIBP and IABP measurement as a difference of > 10 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) AND change of BP management to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mm Hg. RESULTS: We analyzed 127 patients. Among 57 (45%) requiring vasopressors, 9 (16%) patients had a clinically significant BPD vs 2 patients (3% odds ratio [OR] 6.4; 95% CI: 1.2-30; P = 0.01) without vasopressors. In multivariable logistic regression, higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 1.33; 95% CI: 1.02-1.73; P = 0.03) and serum lactate (OR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.003-1.60, P = 0.04) were associated with increased likelihood of clinically significant BPD. There were no complications (95% CI: 0-0.02) from arterial catheter insertions. CONCLUSION: Among our population of septic patients, the use of vasopressors was associated with increased odds of a clinically significant blood pressure discrepancy between IABP and NIBP measurement. Additionally, higher SOFA score and serum lactate were associated with higher likelihood of clinically significant blood pressure discrepancy. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations and investigate the benefits vs the risk of harm of IABP monitoring in patients with sepsis.
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/19128
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.5811/westjem.2022.1.53211
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Arterial or cuff pressure: Clinical predictors among patients in shock in a critical care resuscitation unit.
    • Authors: Keville MP, Gelmann D, Hollis G, Beher R, Raffman A, Tanveer S, Jones K, Parker BM, Haase DJ, Tran QK
    • Issue date: 2021 Aug
    • Predictors of clinically relevant differences between noninvasive versus arterial blood pressure.
    • Authors: Raffman A, Shah U, Barr JF, Hassan S, Azike LU, Tanveer S, Bracklow S, Parker B, Haase DJ, Tran QK
    • Issue date: 2021 May
    • Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
    • Authors: Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, Liu VX, Deutschman CS, Angus DC, Rubenfeld GD, Singer M, Sepsis Definitions Task Force
    • Issue date: 2016 Feb 23
    • Arterial Pressure Monitoring in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: An Observational Study Comparing Invasive and Non-invasive Measurements.
    • Authors: Ricci Z, Brogi J, De Filippis S, Caccavelli R, Morlacchi M, Romagnoli S
    • Issue date: 2019 Aug
    • Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?
    • Authors: Araghi A, Bander JJ, Guzman JA
    • Issue date: 2006
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.