Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Stefan G.
dc.contributor.authorAsnaani, Anu
dc.contributor.authorVonk, Imke J.J.
dc.contributor.authorSawyer, Alice T.
dc.contributor.authorFang, Angela
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-06T20:02:24Z
dc.date.available2022-06-06T20:02:24Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.identifier.citationHofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cognitive therapy and research, 36(5), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/19078
dc.descriptionNIH Public Access Author Manuscript of the same article published in final edited form in the journal, "Cognitive Therapy and Research."en_US
dc.description.abstractCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) refers to a popular therapeutic approach that has been applied to a variety of problems. The goal of this review was to provide a comprehensive survey of meta- analyses examining the efficacy of CBT. We identified 269 meta-analytic studies and reviewed of those a representative sample of 106 meta-analyses examining CBT for the following problems: substance use disorder, schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, depression and dysthymia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, insomnia, personality disorders, anger and aggression, criminal behaviors, general stress, distress due to general medical conditions, chronic pain and fatigue, distress related to pregnancy complications and female hormonal conditions. Additional meta-analytic reviews examined the efficacy of CBT for various problems in children and elderly adults. The strongest support exists for CBT of anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, bulimia, anger control problems, and general stress. Eleven studies compared response rates between CBT and other treatments or control conditions. CBT showed higher response rates than the comparison conditions in 7 of these reviews and only one review reported that CBT had lower response rates than comparison treatments. In general, the evidence- base of CBT is very strong. However, additional research is needed to examine the efficacy of CBT for randomized-controlled studies. Moreover, except for children and elderly populations, no meta-analytic studies of CBT have been reported on specific subgroups, such as ethnic minorities and low income samples.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBoston Universityen_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3584580/en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCBTen_US
dc.subjectefficacyen_US
dc.subjectcomprehensive reviewen_US
dc.subject.lcshDrugs—Effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.lcshMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshCognitive Behavioral Therapyen_US
dc.titleThe Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analysesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.ispublishedNoen_US
refterms.dateFOA2022-06-06T20:02:24Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
nihms394950.pdf
Size:
740.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Research article on CBT

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International