• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Using American Type Culture Collection Cell Lines to Evaluate Interlaboratory Variables for Estrogen Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunostaining.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Witt, Benjamin L
    Zhou, Wenhua
    Ambaye, Abiy B
    Bellizzi, Andrew
    Booth, Christine N
    Sundling, Kaitlin
    Nguyen, Lananh
    Russell, Donna K
    Schinstine, Malcolm
    Staats, Paul N
    Thomsen, Jean
    Troxell, Megan
    Souers, Rhona J
    Dvorak, James
    Lin, Xiaoqi
    Kurtycz, Daniel Fi
    Show allShow less

    Date
    2022-05-31
    Journal
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
    Publisher
    Allen Press
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2021-0152-CP
    Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To explore advantages of using cell lines with known antigenicity as a validation method. DESIGN: Five American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) cell lines with known negative, low positive, and moderate to strong estrogen receptor (ER) expression as well as negative, equivocal, and positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression were cultured and made into cell blocks. One block from each cell line was fixed in formalin and another in ethanol before cell block preparation. Two sets of paired unstained slides from each block were sent to 10 different laboratories for HER2 and ER staining to be stained on runs from different days according to each laboratory's defined protocol. RESULTS: The 10 study participants evaluated 40 slides in a blinded fashion. For ER expression, all 80 interpretations for the ER strong and moderate positive cell lines had the target ER-positive result and 74 of 80 ER-negative cell lines (92.5%) had agreement with the intended negative result. The ER low positive cell line showed varied but positive expression, among all observers. The HER2 (3+)-positive cell lines yielded a target interpretation of 3+ in 65 of 80 (81.2%). For the HER2-negative cell line 69 of 78 interpretations (88.5%) were consistent with the target response (0 or 1+). No significant variation was observed between the ethanol- and non-ethanol-exposed cell lines, or between runs by the same laboratory. Variation from target results clustered within laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that variability between laboratories can be identified by using cell lines for quantitative or semiquantitative immunohistochemistry when using cultured cell lines of known antigenicity. These cell lines could potentially play a role in aiding anatomic pathology laboratories in validating immunohistochemistry tests for formalin- and ethanol-fixed tissues.
    Rights/Terms
    © 2022 College of American Pathologists.
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/19051
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.5858/arpa.2021-0152-CP
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer FNA cell blocks and paired histologic specimens: A large retrospective study.
    • Authors: Vohra P, Buelow B, Chen YY, Serrano M, Vohra MS, Berry A, Ljung BM
    • Issue date: 2016 Nov
    • Quantitative Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Laboratory Performance by Measuring Analytic Response Curves and Limits of Detection.
    • Authors: Sompuram SR, Vani K, Schaedle AK, Balasubramanian A, Bogen SA
    • Issue date: 2018 Jul
    • Use of Web-based training for quality improvement between a field immunohistochemistry laboratory in Nigeria and its United States-based partner institution.
    • Authors: Oluwasola AO, Malaka D, Khramtsov AI, Ikpatt OF, Odetunde A, Adeyanju OO, Sveen WE, Falusi AG, Huo D, Olopade OI
    • Issue date: 2013 Dec
    • Interlaboratory comparison of immunohistochemical testing for HER2: results of the 2004 and 2005 College of American Pathologists HER2 Immunohistochemistry Tissue Microarray Survey.
    • Authors: Fitzgibbons PL, Murphy DA, Dorfman DM, Roche PC, Tubbs RR, Immunohistochemistry Committee, College of American Pathologists
    • Issue date: 2006 Oct
    • Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in formalin-fixed breast carcinoma cell block preparations: correlation of results to corresponding tissue block (needle core and excision) samples.
    • Authors: Kinsella MD, Birdsong GG, Siddiqui MT, Cohen C, Hanley KZ
    • Issue date: 2013 Mar
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.