Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorItani, Rania
dc.contributor.authorKarout, Samar
dc.contributor.authorKhojah, Hani M J
dc.contributor.authorRabah, Makram
dc.contributor.authorKassab, Mohamad B
dc.contributor.authorWelty, Francine K
dc.contributor.authorAlBaghdadi, Mazen
dc.contributor.authorKhraishah, Haitham
dc.contributor.authorEl-Dahiyat, Faris
dc.contributor.authorAlzayani, Salman
dc.contributor.authorKhader, Yousef S
dc.contributor.authorAlyahya, Mohammad S
dc.contributor.authorAlsane, Danah
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Farha, Rana
dc.contributor.authorMukattash, Tareq L
dc.contributor.authorSoukarieh, Tarek
dc.contributor.authorAwad, Mohamad Fawzi
dc.contributor.authorAwad, Reem
dc.contributor.authorWehbi, Abir
dc.contributor.authorAbbas, Fatima
dc.contributor.authorEl Mais, Hadi
dc.contributor.authorEl Mais, Huda
dc.contributor.authorKarout, Lina
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T15:27:37Z
dc.date.available2022-05-09T15:27:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/18799
dc.description.abstractBackground: Public acceptance of governmental measures are key to controlling the spread of infectious diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems for high-income countries as well as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The ability of LMICs to respond to the challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic has been limited and may have affected the impact of governmental strategies to control the spread of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate and compare public opinion on the governmental COVID-19 response of high and LMICs in the Middle East and benchmark it to international countries. Methods: An online, self-administered questionnaire was distributed among different Middle Eastern Arab countries. Participants' demographics and level of satisfaction with governmental responses to COVID-19 were analyzed and reported. Scores were benchmarked against 19 international values. Results: A total of 7395 responses were included. Bahrain scored highest for satisfaction with the governmental response with 38.29 ± 2.93 on a scale of 40, followed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (37.13 ± 3.27), United Arab Emirates (36.56 ± 3.44), Kuwait (35.74 ± 4.85), Jordan (23.08 ± 6.41), and Lebanon (15.39 ± 5.28). Participants' country of residence was a significant predictor of the satisfaction score (P < 0.001), and participants who suffered income reduction due to the pandemic, had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and held higher educational degrees had significantly lower satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). When benchmarked with other international publics, countries from the Gulf Cooperation Council had the highest satisfaction level, Jordan had an average score, and Lebanon had one of the lowest satisfaction scores. Conclusion: The political crisis in Lebanon merged with the existing corruption were associated with the lowest public satisfaction score whereas the economical instability of Jordan placed the country just before the lowest position. On the other hand, the solid economy plus good planning and public trust in the government placed the other countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council on top of the scale. Further investigation is necessary to find out how the governments of other low-income countries may have handled the situation wisely and gained the trust of their publics. This may help convey a clearer picture to Arab governments that have suffered during the pandemic.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13292-9en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.rights© 2022. The Author(s).en_US
dc.subjectArab countriesen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectGovernmenten_US
dc.subjectLevel of satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Easten_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.titleDiverging levels of COVID-19 governmental response satisfaction across middle eastern Arab countries: a multinational study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-022-13292-9
dc.identifier.pmid35513805
dc.source.journaltitleBMC public health
dc.source.volume22
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage893
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryEngland


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record