Diverging levels of COVID-19 governmental response satisfaction across middle eastern Arab countries: a multinational study.
Khojah, Hani M J
Kassab, Mohamad B
Welty, Francine K
Khader, Yousef S
Alyahya, Mohammad S
Mukattash, Tareq L
Awad, Mohamad Fawzi
El Mais, Hadi
El Mais, Huda
JournalBMC Public Health
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: Public acceptance of governmental measures are key to controlling the spread of infectious diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has placed a significant burden on healthcare systems for high-income countries as well as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The ability of LMICs to respond to the challenge of the COVID-19 pandemic has been limited and may have affected the impact of governmental strategies to control the spread of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate and compare public opinion on the governmental COVID-19 response of high and LMICs in the Middle East and benchmark it to international countries. Methods: An online, self-administered questionnaire was distributed among different Middle Eastern Arab countries. Participants' demographics and level of satisfaction with governmental responses to COVID-19 were analyzed and reported. Scores were benchmarked against 19 international values. Results: A total of 7395 responses were included. Bahrain scored highest for satisfaction with the governmental response with 38.29 ± 2.93 on a scale of 40, followed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (37.13 ± 3.27), United Arab Emirates (36.56 ± 3.44), Kuwait (35.74 ± 4.85), Jordan (23.08 ± 6.41), and Lebanon (15.39 ± 5.28). Participants' country of residence was a significant predictor of the satisfaction score (P < 0.001), and participants who suffered income reduction due to the pandemic, had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and held higher educational degrees had significantly lower satisfaction scores (P < 0.001). When benchmarked with other international publics, countries from the Gulf Cooperation Council had the highest satisfaction level, Jordan had an average score, and Lebanon had one of the lowest satisfaction scores. Conclusion: The political crisis in Lebanon merged with the existing corruption were associated with the lowest public satisfaction score whereas the economical instability of Jordan placed the country just before the lowest position. On the other hand, the solid economy plus good planning and public trust in the government placed the other countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council on top of the scale. Further investigation is necessary to find out how the governments of other low-income countries may have handled the situation wisely and gained the trust of their publics. This may help convey a clearer picture to Arab governments that have suffered during the pandemic.
Rights/Terms© 2022. The Author(s).
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/18799
- COVID-19 in conflict region: the arab levant response.
- Authors: Bizri NA, Alam W, Mobayed T, Tamim H, Makki M, Mushrrafieh U
- Issue date: 2021 Aug 26
- SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in the Middle East and North Africa: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.
- Authors: Post L, Marogi E, Moss CB, Murphy RL, Ison MG, Achenbach CJ, Resnick D, Singh L, White J, Boctor MJ, Welch SB, Oehmke JF
- Issue date: 2021 Jan 15
- Forecasting the SARS COVID-19 pandemic and critical care resources threshold in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: population analysis of aggregate data.
- Authors: Al-Aamri AK, Al-Harrasi AA, AAl-Abdulsalam AK, Al-Maniri AA, Padmadas SS
- Issue date: 2021 May 11
- Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.
- Authors: COVID-19 National Preparedness Collaborators.
- Issue date: 2022 Apr 16
- The Arab region's contribution to global COVID-19 research: Bibliometric and visualization analysis.
- Authors: Zyoud SH
- Issue date: 2021 Mar 25