Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Date
2020-04-30Journal
Surgery Open SciencePublisher
ElsevierType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Introduction: Estimating distance is a common task in surgery, yet development of distance estimation ability receives little attention in surgical training. Although the Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH) trial reinforced the importance of suture spacing by demonstrating reduced incisional hernia incidence in placement of 5-mm fascial sutures over 1 cm, we hypothesize that neither trainee nor attending surgeons possess the ability to estimate these distances with accuracy. Methods: We distributed a 4-question distance estimation exercise and a 6-question survey to resident and attending surgeons at a single academic medical center. The mean and the absolute error were compared using a t test. Results: Most participants were trainees (44 vs 16 attendings, N = 60), and 27% used the metric system prior to undergraduate studies. The mean absolute errors for 5-mm and 1-cm mark placement were 1.40 and 2.07 mm, respectively. The 5-mm mark placement estimates ranged from 2.01 to 11.69 mm, and the 1-cm estimates ranged from 4.82 to 19.19 mm. There was no statistically significant difference in the estimates or absolute errors between trainees and attendings (5 mm P = .202; 1 cm P = .302). Conclusion: These findings suggest that estimation of distance is a challenge, and development of this fundamental skill during surgical training may have important clinical consequences. © 2020 The AuthorsRights/Terms
© 2020 The Authors.Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/18540ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.sopen.2020.04.001
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
- Authors: Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, Wijnhoven BP, Schouten WR, Cense HA, Stockmann HB, Berends FJ, Dijkhuizen FPH, Dwarkasing RS, Jairam AP, van Ramshorst GH, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF
- Issue date: 2015 Sep 26
- Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.
- Authors: Bloemen A, De Kleijn RJCMF, Van Steensel S, Aarts F, Schreinemacher MHF, Bouvy ND
- Issue date: 2019 Nov
- A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions.
- Authors: Harlaar JJ, Deerenberg EB, van Ramshorst GH, Lont HE, van der Borst EC, Schouten WR, Heisterkamp J, van Doorn HC, Cense HA, Berends F, Stockmann HB, Vrijland WW, Consten EC, Ottow RT, Go PM, Hermans JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lange JF
- Issue date: 2011 Aug 26
- Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
- Authors: Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR
- Issue date: 2017 Nov 3
- Development of incisional herniation after midline laparotomy.
- Authors: Harlaar JJ, Deerenberg EB, Dwarkasing RS, Kamperman AM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF
- Issue date: 2017 Feb