Validation of xMAP SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG assay in Nigeria.
dc.contributor.author | Iriemenam, Nnaemeka C | |
dc.contributor.author | Ige, Fehintola A | |
dc.contributor.author | Greby, Stacie M | |
dc.contributor.author | Mpamugo, Augustine | |
dc.contributor.author | Abubakar, Ado G | |
dc.contributor.author | Dawurung, Ayuba B | |
dc.contributor.author | Esiekpe, Mudiaga K | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, Andrew N | |
dc.contributor.author | Okoli, Mary U | |
dc.contributor.author | Awala, Samuel S | |
dc.contributor.author | Ugboaja, Blessing N | |
dc.contributor.author | Achugbu, Chicago C | |
dc.contributor.author | Odoh, Ifeanyichukwu | |
dc.contributor.author | Nwatu, Felicia D | |
dc.contributor.author | Olaleye, Temitope | |
dc.contributor.author | Akayi, Loveth | |
dc.contributor.author | Akinmulero, Oluwaseun O | |
dc.contributor.author | Dattijo, Joseph | |
dc.contributor.author | Onokevbagbe, Edewede | |
dc.contributor.author | Okunoye, Olumide | |
dc.contributor.author | Mba, Nwando | |
dc.contributor.author | Agala, Ndidi P | |
dc.contributor.author | Uwandu, Mabel | |
dc.contributor.author | Aniedobe, Maureen | |
dc.contributor.author | Stafford, Kristen A | |
dc.contributor.author | Abimiku, Alash'le | |
dc.contributor.author | Hamada, Yohhei | |
dc.contributor.author | Swaminathan, Mahesh | |
dc.contributor.author | Okoye, McPaul I | |
dc.contributor.author | Steinhardt, Laura C | |
dc.contributor.author | Audu, Rosemary | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-04T12:41:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-04T12:41:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10713/18446 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: There is a need for reliable serological assays to determine accurate estimates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence. Most single target antigen assays have shown some limitations in Africa. To assess the performance of a multi-antigen assay, we evaluated a commercially available SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG assay for human coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Nigeria. Methods: Validation of the xMAP SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG assay was carried out using well-characterized SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reactive positive (97) and pre-COVID-19 pandemic (86) plasma panels. Cross-reactivity was assessed using pre-COVID-19 pandemic plasma specimens (213) from the 2018 Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS). Results: The overall sensitivity of the xMAP SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG assay was 75.3% [95% CI: 65.8%- 82.8%] and specificity was 99.0% [95% CI: 96.8%- 99.7%]. The sensitivity estimate increased to 83.3% [95% CI: 70.4%- 91.3%] for specimens >14 days post-confirmation of diagnosis. However, using the NAIIS pre-pandemic specimens, the false positivity rate was 1.4% (3/213). Conclusions: Our results showed overall lower sensitivity and a comparable specificity with the manufacturer's validation. There appears to be less cross-reactivity with NAIIS pre-pandemic COVID-19 specimens using the xMAP SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG assay. In-country SARS-CoV-2 serology assay validation can help guide the best choice of assays in Africa. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266184 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Public Library of Science | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | PLoS ONE | en_US |
dc.title | Validation of xMAP SARS-CoV-2 Multi-Antigen IgG assay in Nigeria. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0266184 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35363818 | |
dc.source.journaltitle | PloS one | |
dc.source.volume | 17 | |
dc.source.issue | 4 | |
dc.source.beginpage | e0266184 | |
dc.source.endpage | ||
dc.source.country | United States |