• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Reply to McFarland et al.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Heil, Emily
    Harris, Anthony
    Leekha, Surbhi
    Date
    2022-03
    Journal
    Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab619
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab618
    Description
    In reference to McFarland L, Kullar R, Maziade PJ, Goldstein EJ. Why two studies using the same probiotic may have come up with different outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2022; 74:941–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab618
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/18297
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1093/cid/ciab619
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • [Multicenter-evaluation of optimal cell density to determine antimicrobial susceptibility for Haemophilus influenzae by the automated RAISUS system when the early-harvested bacterial cells were used].
    • Authors: Matsukawa Y, Miyabe T, Sawamura H, Higa M, Yamane N, Urasoko A, Endo R
    • Issue date: 2007 Jul
    • Hyperspectral microscopy for characterization of gold nanoparticles in biological media and cells for toxicity assessment.
    • Authors: Grabinski C, Schlager J, Hussain S
    • Issue date: 2013
    • Cryobiopsy Compared with Surgical Lung Biopsy in ILD: Reply to Maldonado <i>et al.</i>, Froidure <i>et al.</i>, Bendstrup <i>et al.</i>, Agarwal <i>et al.</i>, Richeldi <i>et al.</i>, Rajchgot <i>et al.</i>, and Quadrelli <i>et al</i>.
    • Authors: Romagnoli M, Colby TV, Suehs CM, Vachier I, Molinari N, Bourdin A
    • Issue date: 2019 Oct 1
    • Reply to A.C. Olson et al, R.T. Dess et al, D.D. Yang et al, and R.J. Brenneman et al.
    • Authors: Murthy V, Maitre P
    • Issue date: 2021 Sep 1
    • Reply to D.C. Sgroi et al, T. Sanft et al, M.S. Copur et al, and M.P. Goetz et al.
    • Authors: Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F
    • Issue date: 2016 Nov 10
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.