Leadership Strategies to Prevent Employee Substance Abuse Relapse and Optimize Business Viability
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractEmployees, who relapse from substance abuse, precipitate unnecessary costs to employers through absenteeism, production loss, turnover, and health care. Addicted employees who relapse are becoming a growing concern as substance abuse relapse and overdose rates have significantly increased during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The purpose of this qualitative phenomenological study is to explore strategies leaders use to understand the needs of addicted employees during a crisis, reduce employee substance abuse relapse rates, and ensure business viability. The conceptual framework for this study is Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Goleman’s emotional intelligence theory, and emotional sobriety. The population for this study includes 10 leaders located in the United States. The participants were chosen using purposeful snowball sampling and were asked 11 open-ended questions via qualitative interviews to gather rich and detailed data to saturate this study. Through data analysis, the researcher uncovered four themes: (a) meeting employees where they are; (b) building personal connection through vulnerability; (c) diversity and inclusion; (d) strategies formed through education and practical experience. Analysis of the findings revealed that leaders who participated in addiction education and utilized individualized consideration prevented relapse and improved organizational performance by addressing employee needs. The results of this study may be adopted by leaders to effectively retain an engaged and performing workforce by enhancing corporate policy and practices related to addicted employees.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Substance Abuse Relapse
Employee Mental Health
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/17772
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Merged Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) Standards: Employee Assistance Society of North America (EASNA) and Council on Accreditation (COA)Masi, Dale A. (2000)Accreditation applies to institutions and programs, not to individuals. It does not guarantee jobs or businesses for individuals, though being an employee of an accredited program may facilitate further placement or licensing. It speaks to a sense of public trust, as well as to professional quality, and does so through the development of criteria and guidelines for assessing effectiveness, through the process of continuous self-study and review, and through a public commitment to excellence.
Shaking the Tree: From Employee Assistance to Employee Potential - A Commentary & Research ReviewBennett, Joel B. (2012-04)As the field of employee assistance has matured over the past 30 years, this article encourages a review of current and emerging paradigms for the profession. Concepts and research in humanistic and positive psychology, along with research in organizational behavior, wellness, and prevention, suggest a view of EAPs as facilitators of human potential, collaborators and integrators. As a synthesis of these ideas, this article highlights ten ideas for potentiation and three emerging core practices. The focus is on how employee assistance providers can leverage their experience, role and organizational partnerships to implement the following three practices: (1) empower local health strategies amongst individual workers, (2) apply influence for systemic health, and (3) support culture of health organizational strategies.
Relationships, Personal Factors and Work Conditions As Sources Of Stress For Fire Department Employees: An Analysis of Employee and Spouse PerspectivesAttridge, Mark; Lapp, Joni; Jackson, Ruth (1996-07)This study identifies and prioritizes aspects of work and personal life as sources of stress for employees of a city fire department. Surveys were completed by employees (n = 147) and their romantic partners (n = 62). A total of 22 of 33 areas were rated as stressful by a third or more of employees, including personal life areas of maintaining relationships with a romantic partner, with children, and caring for elders. Few significant differences were found between employee and partner perspectives on what was stressful for the employee. When asked to judge the stress level of areas as experienced by other employees, 10 areas were thought to be more stressful for others than for oneself. Implications for coping processes are discussed. Study conducted by Optum Employee Assistance Program for Minneapolis Fire Department (Minnesota).