Electronically Available Patient Claims Data Improve Models for Comparing Antibiotic Use Across Hospitals: Results From 576 US Facilities.
AuthorGoodman, Katherine E
Magder, Laurence S
Anderson, Deverick J
Ashley, Elizabeth Dodds
Polk, Ronald E
Trick, William E
Woeltje, Keith F
Cosgrove, Sara E
Harris, Anthony D
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
PublisherOxford University Press
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses standardized antimicrobial administration ratios (SAARs)-that is, observed-to-predicted ratios-to compare antibiotic use across facilities. CDC models adjust for facility characteristics when predicting antibiotic use but do not include patient diagnoses and comorbidities that may also affect utilization. This study aimed to identify comorbidities causally related to appropriate antibiotic use and to compare models that include these comorbidities and other patient-level claims variables to a facility model for risk-adjusting inpatient antibiotic utilization. METHODS: The study included adults discharged from Premier Database hospitals in 2016-2017. For each admission, we extracted facility, claims, and antibiotic data. We evaluated 7 models to predict an admission's antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs): a CDC facility model, models that added patient clinical constructs in varying layers of complexity, and an external validation of a published patient-variable model. We calculated hospital-specific SAARs to quantify effects on hospital rankings. Separately, we used Delphi Consensus methodology to identify Elixhauser comorbidities associated with appropriate antibiotic use. RESULTS: The study included 11 701 326 admissions across 576 hospitals. Compared to a CDC-facility model, a model that added Delphi-selected comorbidities and a bacterial infection indicator was more accurate for all antibiotic outcomes. For total antibiotic use, it was 24% more accurate (respective mean absolute errors: 3.11 vs 2.35 DOTs), resulting in 31-33% more hospitals moving into bottom or top usage quartiles postadjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Adding electronically available patient claims data to facility models consistently improved antibiotic utilization predictions and yielded substantial movement in hospitals' utilization rankings.
Rights/Terms© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/17524
- The Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratio: A New Metric for Measuring and Comparing Antibiotic Use.
- Authors: van Santen KL, Edwards JR, Webb AK, Pollack LA, O'Leary E, Neuhauser MM, Srinivasan A, Pollock DA
- Issue date: 2018 Jul 2
- Benchmarking Inpatient Antimicrobial Use: A Comparison of Risk-Adjusted Observed-to-Expected Ratios.
- Authors: Yu KC, Moisan E, Tartof SY, Nguyen HM, Rieg G, Ramaprasad C, Jones J
- Issue date: 2018 Nov 13
- Implementing a strategy for monitoring inpatient antimicrobial use among hospitals in the United States.
- Authors: Fridkin SK, Srinivasan A
- Issue date: 2014 Feb
- The Effect of Adding Comorbidities to Current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Risk-Adjustment Methodology.
- Authors: Jackson SS, Leekha S, Magder LS, Pineles L, Anderson DJ, Trick WE, Woeltje KF, Kaye KS, Stafford K, Thom K, Lowe TJ, Harris AD
- Issue date: 2017 Sep
- Electronically Available Comorbidities Should Be Used in Surgical Site Infection Risk Adjustment.
- Authors: Jackson SS, Leekha S, Magder LS, Pineles L, Anderson DJ, Trick WE, Woeltje KF, Kaye KS, Lowe TJ, Harris AD
- Issue date: 2017 Sep 1