• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Electronically Available Patient Claims Data Improve Models for Comparing Antibiotic Use Across Hospitals: Results From 576 US Facilities.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Goodman, Katherine E
    Pineles, Lisa
    Magder, Laurence S
    Anderson, Deverick J
    Ashley, Elizabeth Dodds
    Polk, Ronald E
    Quan, Hude
    Trick, William E
    Woeltje, Keith F
    Leekha, Surbhi
    Cosgrove, Sara E
    Harris, Anthony D
    Show allShow less

    Date
    2021-12-06
    Journal
    Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1127
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/32756970/
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses standardized antimicrobial administration ratios (SAARs)-that is, observed-to-predicted ratios-to compare antibiotic use across facilities. CDC models adjust for facility characteristics when predicting antibiotic use but do not include patient diagnoses and comorbidities that may also affect utilization. This study aimed to identify comorbidities causally related to appropriate antibiotic use and to compare models that include these comorbidities and other patient-level claims variables to a facility model for risk-adjusting inpatient antibiotic utilization. METHODS: The study included adults discharged from Premier Database hospitals in 2016-2017. For each admission, we extracted facility, claims, and antibiotic data. We evaluated 7 models to predict an admission's antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs): a CDC facility model, models that added patient clinical constructs in varying layers of complexity, and an external validation of a published patient-variable model. We calculated hospital-specific SAARs to quantify effects on hospital rankings. Separately, we used Delphi Consensus methodology to identify Elixhauser comorbidities associated with appropriate antibiotic use. RESULTS: The study included 11 701 326 admissions across 576 hospitals. Compared to a CDC-facility model, a model that added Delphi-selected comorbidities and a bacterial infection indicator was more accurate for all antibiotic outcomes. For total antibiotic use, it was 24% more accurate (respective mean absolute errors: 3.11 vs 2.35 DOTs), resulting in 31-33% more hospitals moving into bottom or top usage quartiles postadjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Adding electronically available patient claims data to facility models consistently improved antibiotic utilization predictions and yielded substantial movement in hospitals' utilization rankings.
    Rights/Terms
    © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
    Keyword
    antibiotic stewardship
    antimicrobial use
    benchmarking
    risk adjustment
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/17524
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1093/cid/ciaa1127
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • The Standardized Antimicrobial Administration Ratio: A New Metric for Measuring and Comparing Antibiotic Use.
    • Authors: van Santen KL, Edwards JR, Webb AK, Pollack LA, O'Leary E, Neuhauser MM, Srinivasan A, Pollock DA
    • Issue date: 2018 Jul 2
    • Benchmarking Inpatient Antimicrobial Use: A Comparison of Risk-Adjusted Observed-to-Expected Ratios.
    • Authors: Yu KC, Moisan E, Tartof SY, Nguyen HM, Rieg G, Ramaprasad C, Jones J
    • Issue date: 2018 Nov 13
    • Implementing a strategy for monitoring inpatient antimicrobial use among hospitals in the United States.
    • Authors: Fridkin SK, Srinivasan A
    • Issue date: 2014 Feb
    • The Effect of Adding Comorbidities to Current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Risk-Adjustment Methodology.
    • Authors: Jackson SS, Leekha S, Magder LS, Pineles L, Anderson DJ, Trick WE, Woeltje KF, Kaye KS, Stafford K, Thom K, Lowe TJ, Harris AD
    • Issue date: 2017 Sep
    • Electronically Available Comorbidities Should Be Used in Surgical Site Infection Risk Adjustment.
    • Authors: Jackson SS, Leekha S, Magder LS, Pineles L, Anderson DJ, Trick WE, Woeltje KF, Kaye KS, Lowe TJ, Harris AD
    • Issue date: 2017 Sep 1
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.