Planned Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Adversely Impacts Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Performed with Thymoglobulin for Myeloid Malignancy
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Orfali, NinaZhang, Mei Jie
Allbee-Johnson, Mariam
Boelens, Jaap Jan
Artz, Andrew S.
Brunstein, Claudio G.
McNiece, Ian K.
Milano, Filippo
Abid, Muhammad Bilal
Chee, Lynette
Diaz, Miguel A.
Grunwald, Michael R.
Hematti, Peiman
Hsu, Jingmei
Lazarus, Hillard M.
Munshi, Pashna N.
Prestidge, Timothy
Ringden, Olle
Rizzieri, David
Riches, Marcie L.
Seo, Sachiko
Solh, Melhem
Solomon, Scott
Szwajcer, David
Yared, Jean
van Besien, Koen
Eapen, Mary
Date
2021-09-08Journal
Transplantation and Cellular TherapyPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The in vivo depletion of recipient and donor T lymphocytes using antithymocyte globulin (ATG; Thymoglobulin) is widely adopted in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) to reduce the incidence of both graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, excess toxicity to donor lymphocytes may hamper immune reconstitution, compromising antitumor effects and increasing infection. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administered early after HCT may increase ATG-mediated lymphotoxicity. This study aimed to investigate the effect of an interaction between ATG and post-transplantation granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on allogeneic HCT outcomes, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry. We studied patients age ≥18 years with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received Thymoglobulin-containing preparative regimens for HLA-matched sibling/unrelated or mismatched unrelated donor HCT between 2010 and 2018. The effect of planned G-CSF that was started between pretransplantation day 3 and post-transplantation day 12 was studied in comparison with transplantations that did not include G-CSF. Cox regression models were built to identify risk factors associated with outcomes at 1 year after transplantation. A total of 874 patients met the study eligibility criteria, of whom 459 (53%) received planned G-CSF. HCT with planned G-CSF was associated with a significantly increased risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.03; P <.0001; 21% versus 12%) compared to HCT without G-CSF. The 6-month incidence of viral infection was higher with G-CSF (56% versus 47%; P = .007), with a particular increase in Epstein-Barr virus infections (19% versus 11%; P = .002). The observed higher NRM with planned G-CSF led to lower overall survival (HR, 1.52; P = .0005; 61% versus 72%). There was no difference in GVHD risk between the treatment groups. We performed 2 subgroup analyses showing that our findings held true in patients age ≥50 years and in centers where G-CSF was used in some, but not all, patients. In allogeneic peripheral blood HCT performed with Thymoglobulin for AML and MDS, G-CSF administered early post-transplantation resulted in a 2-fold increase in NRM and a 10% absolute decrement in survival. The use of planned G-CSF in the early post-transplantation period should be carefully considered on an individual patient basis, weighing any perceived benefits against these risks. © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular TherapySponsors
National Institutes of HealthKeyword
Antithymocyte globulinFilgrastim
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Thymoglobulin
Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/17398ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jtct.2021.08.031