A Useful and Sustainable Role for N-of-1 Trials in the Healthcare Ecosystem
Author
Selker, Harry PCohen, Theodora
D'Agostino, Ralph B
Dere, Willard H
Ghaemi, S Nassir
Honig, Peter K
Kaitin, Kenneth I
Kaplan, Heather C
Kravitz, Richard L
Larholt, Kay
McElwee, Newell E
Oye, Kenneth A
Palm, Marisha E
Perfetto, Eleanor
Ramanathan, Chandra
Schmid, Christopher H
Seyfert-Margolis, Vicki
Trusheim, Mark
Eichler, Hans-Georg
Date
2021-09-22Journal
Clinical Pharmacology and TherapeuticsPublisher
Wiley-BlackwellType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Clinicians and patients often try a treatment for an initial period to inform longer-term therapeutic decisions. A more rigorous approach involves N-of-1 trials. In these single-patient crossover trials, typically conducted in patients with chronic conditions, individual patients are given candidate treatments in a double-blinded, random sequence of alternating periods to determine the most effective treatment for that patient. However, to date, these trials are rarely done outside of research settings and have not been integrated into general care where they could offer substantial benefit. Designating this classical, N-of-1 trial design as type 1, there also are new and evolving uses of N-of-1 trials that we designate as type 2. In these, rather than focusing on optimizing treatment for chronic diseases when multiple approved choices are available, as is typical of type 1, a type 2 N-of-1 trial tests treatments designed specifically for a patient with a rare disease, to facilitate personalized medicine. While the aims differ, both types face the challenge of collecting individual-patient evidence using standard, trusted, widely accepted methods. To fulfill their potential for producing both clinical and research benefits, and to be available for wide use, N-of-1 trials will have to fit into the current healthcare ecosystem. This will require generalizable and accepted processes, platforms, methods, and standards. This also will require sustainable value-based arrangements among key stakeholders. In this article, we review opportunities, stakeholders, issues, and possible approaches that could support general use of N-of-1 trials and deliver benefit to patients and the healthcare enterprise. To assess and expand the benefits of N-of-1 trials, we propose multistakeholder meetings, workshops, and the generation of methods, standards, and platforms that would support wider availability and the value of N-of-1 trials. © 2021 The Authors.Rights/Terms
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/16971ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/cpt.2425
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
- Authors: Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W
- Issue date: 2020 Nov
- Qualitative Study
- Authors: Tenny S, Brannan GD, Brannan JM, Sharts-Hopko NC
- Issue date: 2022 Jan
- Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
- Authors: Hijjeh M, Al Shaikh L, Alinier G, Selwood D, Malmstrom F, Hassan IF
- Issue date: 2019
- The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
- Authors: Green AK, Reeder-Hayes KE, Corty RW, Basch E, Milowsky MI, Dusetzina SB, Bennett AV, Wood WA
- Issue date: 2015 May
- Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
- Authors: Modi N
- Issue date: 2014