• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Formulary tiers, medication cost sharing, and transparency in bronze and silver qualified health plans in 2014 vs 2018

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Hung, Anna
    Sauvageau, Griffin
    Date
    2021-10
    Journal
    Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy
    Publisher
    Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP)
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.18553/JMCP.2021.27.10.1332
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND: In 2014, qualified health plans sold in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces were accused of providing drug coverage that was too restrictive and costly. After the change in administration in 2016, efforts to repeal portions of the ACA led to increases in premiums, decreases in enrollment, and overall uncertainty. OBJECTIVE: To examine how the number of formulary tiers and medication cost sharing, as well as transparency around these aspects, in qualified bronze and silver health plans in California, Florida, and Illinois changed from 2014 to 2018. METHODS: A search of all bronze and silver qualified health plans in California, Florida, and Illinois was performed in 2014 and in 2018 through the marketplace and issuer websites. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, the total number of bronze and silver qualified health plans offered in California, Florida, and Illinois remained relatively stable (36 to 35, 123 to 122, and 60 to 74, respectively). Over the same time period, the median number of formulary tiers remained constant for California and Florida (four and five) and increased from five to seven for Illinois. Of note, most Illinois plans shifted from a formulary with five or fewer tiers (92% of plans) to seven tiers (73% of plans) between 2014 and 2018. There was also an increase in the use of coinsurance instead of copay for each of the four following formulary tiers: generic (19% to 27% of plans), preferred brand (21% to 38%), nonpreferred brand (33% to 52%), and specialty (76% to 91%). Additionally, there was an increase in the median coinsurance rates for each of the aforementioned tiers: 0% to 25%, 0% to 35%, 30% to 40%, and 30% to 40%, respectively. The proportion of plans that provided their formularies on the marketplace website increased from 82% to 97% from 2014 to 2018, with the increase mostly driven by California plans (0% to 80%). There was a small increase in the proportion of plans that reported medication cost sharing through the medical benefit from 2014 (19%) to 2018 (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Between 2014 and 2018, qualified health plans increased their use of formularies with greater numbers of tiers, the use of coinsurance for each tier, and higher coinsurance rates. Availability of formularies on marketplace websites increased, but cost sharing transparency for medications covered by the medical benefit could greatly improve. DISCLOSURES: No funding supported this study. Hung reports past employment by Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, CVS Health, and a grant from PhRMA outside of the submitted work. She was an intern at the Biotechnology Industry Organization when this work began. Sauvageau has no disclosures. This work was presented as a poster at the AMCP 2018 Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 23-26, 2018; Boston, MA.
    Keyword
    formulary tiers
    medication cost sharing
    qualified health plans
    Formularies as Topic
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/16946
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1332
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • An early examination of access to select orphan drugs treating rare diseases in health insurance exchange plans.
    • Authors: Robinson SW, Brantley K, Liow C, Teagarden JR
    • Issue date: 2014 Oct
    • Do drug formulary policies reflect evidence of value?
    • Authors: Neumann PJ, Lin PJ, Greenberg D, Berger M, Teutsch S, Mansley E, Weinstein MC, Rosen AB
    • Issue date: 2006 Jan
    • Changes in Consumer Cost-Sharing for Health Plans Sold in the ACA's Insurance Marketplaces, 2015 to 2016.
    • Authors: Gabel J, Green M, Call A, Whitmore H, Stromberg S, Oran R
    • Issue date: 2016 May
    • Examining the Value of Subsidies of Health Plans and Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs in the Health Insurance Marketplace.
    • Authors: Ngorsuraches S, Mort JR
    • Issue date: 2016 Oct
    • Does a One-Size-Fits-All Cost-Sharing Approach Incentivize Appropriate Medication Use? A Roundtable on the Fairness and Ethics Associated with Variable Cost Sharing.
    • Authors: Graff JS, Shih C, Barker T, Dieguez G, Larson C, Sherman H, Dubois RW
    • Issue date: 2017 Jun
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.