Mental Health Apps & Their Efficacy Rates with Remote Use: Literature Review and EAP Industry Trend Survey Results

Attridge, Mark

dc.contributor.author	Attridge, Mark
dc.date.accessioned	2021-10-20T20:01:01Z
dc.date.available	2021-10-20T20:01:01Z
dc.date.issued	2021-10-04
dc.identifier.citation	Attridge, M. (2021, October 4). Mental health apps & their efficacy rates with remote use: Literature review and EAP industry trend survey results. Presented at fall conference of the EAP Roundtable.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10713/16888
dc.description.abstract	Presentation to internal staff model EAPs in the United States.	en_US
dc.description.sponsorship	The EAP Roundtable. Attridge Consulting, Inc.	en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents	Three parts: 1) To define and distinguish the different types of technological tools for supporting mental health. 2) To learn the advantages and disadvantages of technology-based support tools for supporting mental health (research literature review). 3) To determine how professionals in the field of EAP evaluate the effectiveness and purpose of technology-based support tools for supporting mental health (survey study results). References.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.rights	Copyright by Attridge Consulting, Inc.	en_US
dc.subject	EAP	en_US
dc.subject	Internal staff model program	en_US
dc.subject	survey research	en_US
dc.subject	literature review	en_US
dc.subject	business strategy	en_US
dc.subject	integration	en_US
dc.subject.lcsh	Employee assistance programs	en_US
dc.subject.lcsh	Counseling	en_US
dc.subject.lcsh	Technology	en_US
dc.subject.lcsh	Mental health	en_US
dc.title	Mental Health Apps & Their Efficacy Rates with Remote Use: Literature Review and EAP Industry Trend Survey Results	en_US
dc.type	Conference/Congress	en_US
dc.type	Poster/Presentation	en_US
dc.identifier.ispublished	No	en_US
refterms.dateFOA	2021-10-20T20:01:02Z