Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaba, Prakriti
dc.contributor.authorBhatt, Deepak L
dc.contributor.authorGiugliano, Robert P
dc.contributor.authorSteg, Ph Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBrinton, Eliot A
dc.contributor.authorJacobson, Terry A
dc.contributor.authorKetchum, Steven B
dc.contributor.authorJuliano, Rebecca A
dc.contributor.authorJiao, Lixia
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Ralph T
dc.contributor.authorGranowitz, Craig
dc.contributor.authorTardif, Jean-Claude
dc.contributor.authorBallantyne, Christie M
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Duane S
dc.contributor.authorBudoff, Matthew J
dc.contributor.authorGibson, C Michael
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-15T18:03:00Z
dc.date.available2021-10-15T18:03:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/16850
dc.description.abstractBackground: REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial) randomized statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides to icosapent ethyl (IPE) or placebo. There was a significant reduction in adjudicated events, including the primary endpoint (cardiovascular [CV] death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, coronary revascularization, unstable angina requiring hospitalization) and key secondary endpoint (CV death, MI, stroke) with IPE. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of IPE on investigator-reported events. Methods: Potential endpoints were collected by blinded site investigators and subsequently adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) according to a prespecified charter. Investigator-reported events were compared with adjudicated events for concordance. Results: There was a high degree of concordance between investigator-reported and adjudicated endpoints. The simple Kappa statistic between CEC-adjudicated vs site-reported events for the primary endpoint was 0.89 and for the key secondary endpoint was 0.90. Based on investigator-reported events in 8,179 randomized patients, IPE significantly reduced the rate of the primary endpoint (19.1% vs 24.6%; HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.67-0.81]; P < 0.0001) and the key secondary endpoint (10.5% vs 13.6%; HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.66-0.85]; P < 0.0001). Among adjudicated events, IPE similarly reduced the rate of the primary and key secondary endpoints. Conclusions: IPE led to consistent, significant reductions in CV events, including MI and coronary revascularization, as determined by independent, blinded CEC adjudication as well as by blinded investigator-reported assessment. These results highlight the robust evidence for the substantial CV benefits of IPE seen in REDUCE-IT and further raise the question of whether adjudication of CV outcome trial endpoints is routinely required in blinded, placebo-controlled trials. (Evaluation of the Effect of AMR101 on Cardiovascular Health and Mortality in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients With Cardiovascular Disease or at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: REDUCE-IT [Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With EPA - Intervention Trial]; NCT01492361).en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.009en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American College of Cardiologyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectcentral adjudicationen_US
dc.subjectclinical trialsen_US
dc.subjecticosapent ethylen_US
dc.subjectinvestigator-reported endpointsen_US
dc.titleComparative Reductions in Investigator-Reported and Adjudicated Ischemic Events in REDUCE-ITen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.009
dc.identifier.pmid34620410
dc.source.volume78
dc.source.issue15
dc.source.beginpage1525
dc.source.endpage1537
dc.identifier.eissn1558-3597
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.identifier.journalJournal of the American College of Cardiology


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record