Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHanley, Allison
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Quynh C
dc.contributor.authorBadawi, Deborah Golant
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jie
dc.contributor.authorMa, Tianzhou
dc.contributor.authorSlopen, Natalie
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-15T16:25:51Z
dc.date.available2021-10-15T16:25:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/16846
dc.description.abstractBackground: Autism prevalence has increased rapidly in recent years, however, nationally representative estimates on the ages of first identification and intervention are out of date. Objectives: (1) To estimate the ages at which children with autism receive their first diagnosis, intervention plan, and developmental services; and (2) To evaluate differences in ages at events by birth cohort and sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: Using cross-sectional data from the 2016-2018 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), we examined associations via linear regression among a sample of 2303 children aged 2-17 years old, who had ever been diagnosed with autism and either (1) ever had a plan for special education or early intervention, or (2) ever received special services to meet developmental needs. Exposures included age cohort, child, household and healthcare provider characteristics. Results: Most children in the study sample (n = 2303) were over age 6 years, male, of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity and had mild/moderate autism. Mean ages (years) at first diagnosis was 4.56 (SE = 0.13); first plan was 4.43 (SE = 0.11); and first services was 4.10 (SE = 0.11). After adjustment for exposures and survey year, the middle childhood cohort was 18 months older at first intervention (β = 1.49, 95% CI, 1.18-1.81), and adolescents were 38 months older at first diagnosis (β = 3.16, 95% CI, 2.72-3.60) compared to those in early childhood. Younger ages at events were observed among: Hispanic/Latinx as compared to white children, those with moderate or severe symptoms as compared to mild symptoms, and children who received their diagnosis from a specialist as compared to psychologists or psychiatrists. Conclusions: Children with autism receive their first diagnosis, intervention plans and developmental services at younger ages than they had in the past. Future research is needed to identify the mechanisms for these improvements in early identification and intervention to accelerate additional progress.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-021-00409-yen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Healthen_US
dc.rights© 2021. The Author(s).en_US
dc.subjectAutism spectrum disorderen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic odysseyen_US
dc.subjectEarly identificationen_US
dc.subjectEarly interventionen_US
dc.titleThe diagnostic odyssey of autism: a cross-sectional study of 3 age cohorts of children from the 2016-2018 National Survey of Children's Healthen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13034-021-00409-y
dc.identifier.pmid34629109
dc.source.volume15
dc.source.issue1
dc.source.beginpage58
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryEngland


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record