Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShipe, Stacey L.
dc.contributor.authorShdaimah, Corey S.
dc.contributor.authorCannone, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-15T14:15:40Z
dc.date.available2021-10-15T14:15:40Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/16836
dc.description.abstractThere has been little focus on decision making in child protective services, particular as it relates to the implementation of alternative response (AR). Focus groups were held in urban, suburban, and rural counties where participants explored how organizational culture influenced decisions made for families when implementing a new statewide policy. The results suggest that decisions are not family focused but are mandate driven. Further, there was a lack of support at both the supervisory and administrative levels which resulted in moral distress and apathy. Suggestions for taking an organizational change approach that gives voice to the caseworker are offered.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1842287en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Inc.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Public Child Welfareen_US
dc.subjectalternative responseen_US
dc.subjectorganizational cultureen_US
dc.subjectpolicy implementationen_US
dc.subject.lcshDecision makingen_US
dc.titlePolicy on the ground: caseworker perspectives on implementing alternative responseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15548732.2020.1842287


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record