Medical malpractice in stress urinary incontinence management: A 30-year legal database review
PublisherWolters Kluwer Health
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: The purpose of this study is to investigate the most common reasons for and judicial outcomes of malpractice claims related to stress urinary incontinence (SUI) management. Materials and methods: Using the Westlaw database, a search was performed using the terms "medical malpractice" or "negligence" in combination with "stress incontinence" or "stress urinary incontinence" between January 1, 1990 and January 1, 2020. Extracted information included trial date, demographic information, defendant profession, procedure performed, procedure complications, alleged malpractice, trial outcome, and monetary award. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The Westlaw search yielded 79 case results. Of the cases, 70.4% (n = 38/54) had a defense verdict, 22.2% (n = 12/54) had a plaintiff verdict, and 7.4% (n = 4/54) were settled. The most commonly implicated procedure was mid-urethral sling (63.2%, n = 36/57). Among the plaintiffs, 48.4% (n = 61/126) claimed negligence in preoperative care, 33.3% (n = 42/126) claimed negligence in surgical performance, and 18.3% (n = 23/126) claimed negligence in postoperative care. Lack of informed consent was the most common complaint related to negligence in preoperative care (42.6%, n = 26/61). The average indemnity payment was $1,253,644 for preoperative care negligence, $1,254,491 for surgical performance negligence, and $2,239,198 for postoperative care negligence. Of the defendants, 63.4% (n = 52) were gynecologists and 36.6% (n = 30) were urologists. Conclusions: Negligent preoperative care, with a particular emphasis on failure to obtain informed consent, and negligent surgical performance are the leading causes of malpractice claims during SUI management. Mid-urethral sling was the most commonly litigated procedure. This study highlights key factors to consider in minimizing malpractice risk during SUI management.
Rights/TermsCopyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/16797
- Legal Review of Vasectomy Litigation and the Variables Impacting Trial Outcomes.
- Authors: Blazek AJ, Belle JD, Deibert MP, Deibert CM
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- Analysis of Factors Associated With Rhytidectomy Malpractice Litigation Cases.
- Authors: Kandinov A, Mutchnick S, Nangia V, Svider PF, Zuliani GF, Shkoukani MA, Carron MA
- Issue date: 2017 Jul 1
- Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.
- Authors: Hwang R, Park HY, Sheppard W, Bernthal NM
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
- Urethral catheters and medical malpractice: a legal database review from 1965 to 2015.
- Authors: Awad MA, Osterberg EC, Chang H, Gaither TW, Alwaal A, Fox R, Breyer BN
- Issue date: 2016 Oct
- Litigation Patterns in Oncologic Nephrectomies: A 30-Year Review.
- Authors: Herbert AS, Hadavand MA, Ambinder D, Phelan MW, Siddiqui MM
- Issue date: 2021 Aug