• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Veronesi, Giulia
    Abbas, Abbas El-Sayed
    Muriana, Piergiorgio
    Lembo, Rosalba
    Bottoni, Edoardo
    Perroni, Gianluca
    Testori, Alberto
    Dieci, Elisa
    Bakhos, Charles T
    Car, Shamus
    Luzzi, Luca
    Alloisio, Marco
    Novellis, Pierluigi
    Show allShow less

    Date
    2021-09-09
    Journal
    Frontiers in Oncology
    Publisher
    Frontiers Media S.A.
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.726408
    Abstract
    Introduction: We report the results of the first prospective international randomized control trial to compare the perioperative outcome and surgical radicality of the robotic approach with those of traditional video-assisted surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T1–T2, N0–N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection arms. The primary objective was the incidence of adverse events including complications and conversion to thoracotomy. The secondary objectives included extent of lymph node (LN) dissection and other indicators. Results: This trial was closed at 83 cases as the probability of concluding in favor of the robot arm for the primary outcome was null according to the observed trend. In this study, we report the results of the analysis conducted on the patients enrolled until trial suspension. Thirty-nine cases were randomized in the VATS arm and 38 in the robotic arm. Six patients were excluded from analysis. Despite finding no difference between the two arms in perioperative complications, conversions, duration of surgery, or duration of postoperative stay, a significantly greater degree of LN assessment by the robotic technique was observed in regards to the median number of sampled LN stations [6, interquartile range (IQR) 4–6 vs. 4, IQR 3–5; p = 0.0002], hilar LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 4, IQR 2–7; p = 0.0003), and mediastinal LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 5, IQR 3–7; p = 0.0001). Conclusions: The results of this trial demonstrated that RATS was not superior to VATS considering the perioperative outcome for early-stage NSCLC, but the robotic approach allowed an improvement of LN dissection. Further studies are suggested to validate the results of this trial.
    Rights/Terms
    Copyright © 2021 Veronesi, Abbas, Muriana, Lembo, Bottoni, Perroni, Testori, Dieci, Bakhos, Car, Luzzi, Alloisio and Novellis.
    Keyword
    VATS
    non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    randomized study
    robotic surgery
    surgery
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/16743
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.3389/fonc.2021.726408
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Propensity-score adjusted comparison of pathologic nodal upstaging by robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.
    • Authors: Kneuertz PJ, Cheufou DH, D'Souza DM, Mardanzai K, Abdel-Rasoul M, Theegarten D, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Aigner C, Merritt RE
    • Issue date: 2019 Nov
    • Early outcomes of robotic versus thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis.
    • Authors: Zhang Y, Chen C, Hu J, Han Y, Huang M, Xiang J, Li H
    • Issue date: 2020 Nov
    • Robotic-assisted Versus Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: Short-term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RVlob Trial).
    • Authors: Jin R, Zheng Y, Yuan Y, Han D, Cao Y, Zhang Y, Li C, Xiang J, Zhang Z, Niu Z, Lerut T, Lin J, Abbas AE, Pardolesi A, Suda T, Amore D, Schraag S, Aigner C, Li J, Che J, Hang J, Ren J, Zhu L, Li H
    • Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
    • Comparison between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal and hilar lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery.
    • Authors: Haruki T, Takagi Y, Kubouchi Y, Kidokoro Y, Nakanishi A, Nozaka Y, Oshima Y, Matsui S, Nakamura H
    • Issue date: 2021 Aug 18
    • Robotic-Assisted Videothoracoscopic Surgery of the Lung.
    • Authors: Velez-Cubian FO, Ng EP, Fontaine JP, Toloza EM
    • Issue date: 2015 Jul
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.