Factors associated with receipt of intracranial pressure monitoring in older adults with traumatic brain injury
Michetti, Christopher P
Winfield, Robert D
Adams, Sasha D
Zacko, J Christopher
Nasrallah, Fady S
Schaffer, Kathryn B
Dunn, Julie A
Schroeppel, Thomas J
Stein, Deborah M
JournalTrauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground: The Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) include intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM), yet very little is known about ICPM in older adults. Our objectives were to characterize the utilization of ICPM in older adults and identify factors associated with ICPM in those who met the BTF guidelines. Methods: We analyzed data from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Geriatric TBI Study, a registry study conducted among individuals with isolated, CT-confirmed TBI across 45 trauma centers. The analysis was restricted to those aged ≥60. Independent factors associated with ICPM for those who did and did not meet the BTF guidelines were identified using logistic regression. Results: Our sample was composed of 2303 patients, of whom 66 (2.9%) underwent ICPM. Relative to Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15, GCS score of 9 to 12 (OR 10.2; 95% CI 4.3 to 24.4) and GCS score of <9 (OR 15.0; 95% CI 7.2 to 31.1), intraventricular hemorrhage (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.83), skull fractures (OR 3.6; 95% CI 2.0 to 6.6), CT worsening (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.8 to 5.9), and neurosurgical interventions (OR 3.8; 95% CI 2.1 to 7.0) were significantly associated with ICPM. Restricting to those who met the BTF guidelines, only 43 of 240 (18%) underwent ICPM. Factors independently associated with ICPM included intraparenchymal hemorrhage (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0 to 4.7), skull fractures (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.9 to 8.2), and neurosurgical interventions (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.2). Discussion: Worsening GCS, intraparenchymal/intraventricular hemorrhage, and skull fractures were associated with ICPM among older adults with TBI, yet utilization of ICPM remains low, especially among those meeting the BTF guidelines, and potential benefits remain unclear. This study highlights the need for better understanding of factors that influence compliance with BTF guidelines and the risks versus benefits of ICPM in this population. Level of evidence: Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.
Rights/Terms© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/16440
- A Propensity Score Analysis of the Impact of Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring on Outcomes after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
- Authors: Agrawal D, Raghavendran K, Schaubel DE, Mishra MC, Rajajee V
- Issue date: 2016 May 1
- Is There an Age Cutoff for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring?: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.
- Authors: Liveris A, Parsikia A, Melvin J, Chao E, Reddy SH, Teperman S, Stone ME Jr
- Issue date: 2022 Jun
- Variation in neurosurgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury: The challenge of measuring quality in trauma center verification.
- Authors: Truong EI, Stanley SP, DeMario BS, Tseng ES, Como JJ, Ho VP, Kelly ML
- Issue date: 2021 Jul 1
- Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Compliance and Effect on Outcome.
- Authors: Aiolfi A, Benjamin E, Khor D, Inaba K, Lam L, Demetriades D
- Issue date: 2017 Jun
- Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injuries: a closer look at level 1 trauma centers in the United States.
- Authors: Piccinini A, Lewis M, Benjamin E, Aiolfi A, Inaba K, Demetriades D
- Issue date: 2017 Sep