Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Author
Hui, Steve C NMikkelsen, Mark
Zöllner, Helge J
Ahluwalia, Vishwadeep
Alcauter, Sarael
Baltusis, Laima
Barany, Deborah A
Barlow, Laura R
Becker, Robert
Berman, Jeffrey I
Berrington, Adam
Bhattacharyya, Pallab K
Blicher, Jakob Udby
Bogner, Wolfgang
Brown, Mark S
Calhoun, Vince D
Castillo, Ryan
Cecil, Kim M
Choi, Yeo Bi
Chu, Winnie C W
Clarke, William T
Craven, Alexander R
Cuypers, Koen
Dacko, Michael
de la Fuente-Sandoval, Camilo
Desmond, Patricia
Domagalik, Aleksandra
Dumont, Julien
Duncan, Niall W
Dydak, Ulrike
Dyke, Katherine
Edmondson, David A
Ende, Gabriele
Ersland, Lars
Evans, C John
Fermin, Alan S R
Ferretti, Antonio
Fillmer, Ariane
Gong, Tao
Greenhouse, Ian
Grist, James T
Gu, Meng
Harris, Ashley D
Hat, Katarzyna
Heba, Stefanie
Heckova, Eva
Hegarty, John P
Heise, Kirstin-Friederike
Jacobson, Aaron
Jansen, Jacobus F A
Jenkins, Christopher W
Johnston, Stephen J
Juchem, Christoph
Kangarlu, Alayar
Kerr, Adam B
Landheer, Karl
Lange, Thomas
Lee, Phil
Levendovszky, Swati Rane
Limperopoulos, Catherine
Liu, Feng
Lloyd, William
Lythgoe, David J
Machizawa, Maro G
MacMillan, Erin L
Maddock, Richard J
Manzhurtsev, Andrei V
Martinez-Gudino, María L
Miller, Jack J
Mirzakhanian, Heline
Moreno-Ortega, Marta
Mullins, Paul G
Near, Jamie
Noeske, Ralph
Nordhøy, Wibeke
Oeltzschner, Georg
Osorio-Duran, Raul
Otaduy, Maria C G
Pasaye, Erick H
Peeters, Ronald
Peltier, Scott J
Pilatus, Ulrich
Polomac, Nenad
Porges, Eric C
Pradhan, Subechhya
Prisciandaro, James Joseph
Puts, Nicolaas A
Rae, Caroline D
Reyes-Madrigal, Francisco
Roberts, Timothy P L
Robertson, Caroline E
Rosenberg, Jens T
Rotaru, Diana-Georgiana
O'Gorman Tuura, Ruth L
Saleh, Muhammad G
Sandberg, Kristian
Sangill, Ryan
Schembri, Keith
Schrantee, Anouk
Semenova, Natalia A
Singel, Debra
Sitnikov, Rouslan
Smith, Jolinda
Song, Yulu
Stark, Craig
Stoffers, Diederick
Swinnen, Stephan P
Tain, Rongwen
Tanase, Costin
Tapper, Sofie
Tegenthoff, Martin
Thiel, Thomas
Thioux, Marc
Truong, Peter
van Dijk, Pim
Vella, Nolan
Vidyasagar, Rishma
Vovk, Andrej
Wang, Guangbin
Westlye, Lars T
Wilbur, Timothy K
Willoughby, William R
Wilson, Martin
Wittsack, Hans-Jörg
Woods, Adam J
Wu, Yen-Chien
Xu, Junqian
Lopez, Maria Yanez
Yeung, David K W
Zhao, Qun
Zhou, Xiaopeng
Zupan, Gasper
Edden, Richard A E
Nakajima, Shinichiro Luke
Honda, Shiori
Date
2021-07-24Journal
NeuroImagePublisher
Elsevier Inc.Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: Heating of gradient coils and passive shim components is a common cause of instability in the B0 field, especially when gradient intensive sequences are used. The aim of the study was to set a benchmark for typical drift encountered during MR spectroscopy (MRS) to assess the need for real-time field-frequency locking on MRI scanners by comparing field drift data from a large number of sites. Method: A standardized protocol was developed for 80 participating sites using 99 3T MR scanners from 3 major vendors. Phantom water signals were acquired before and after an EPI sequence. The protocol consisted of: minimal preparatory imaging; a short pre-fMRI PRESS; a ten-minute fMRI acquisition; and a long post-fMRI PRESS acquisition. Both pre- and post-fMRI PRESS were non-water suppressed. Real-time frequency stabilization/adjustment was switched off when appropriate. Sixty scanners repeated the protocol for a second dataset. In addition, a three-hour post-fMRI MRS acquisition was performed at one site to observe change of gradient temperature and drift rate. Spectral analysis was performed using MATLAB. Frequency drift in pre-fMRI PRESS data were compared with the first 5:20 minutes and the full 30:00 minutes of data after fMRI. Median (interquartile range) drifts were measured and showed in violin plot. Paired t-tests were performed to compare frequency drift pre- and post-fMRI. A simulated in vivo spectrum was generated using FID-A to visualize the effect of the observed frequency drifts. The simulated spectrum was convolved with the frequency trace for the most extreme cases. Impacts of frequency drifts on NAA and GABA were also simulated as a function of linear drift. Data from the repeated protocol were compared with the corresponding first dataset using Pearson's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: Of the data collected from 99 scanners, 4 were excluded due to various reasons. Thus, data from 95 scanners were ultimately analyzed. For the first 5:20 min (64 transients), median (interquartile range) drift was 0.44 (1.29) Hz before fMRI and 0.83 (1.29) Hz after. This increased to 3.15 (4.02) Hz for the full 30 min (360 transients) run. Average drift rates were 0.29 Hz/min before fMRI and 0.43 Hz/min after. Paired t-tests indicated that drift increased after fMRI, as expected (p < 0.05). Simulated spectra convolved with the frequency drift showed that the intensity of the NAA singlet was reduced by up to 26%, 44 % and 18% for GE, Philips and Siemens scanners after fMRI, respectively. ICCs indicated good agreement between datasets acquired on separate days. The single site long acquisition showed drift rate was reduced to 0.03 Hz/min approximately three hours after fMRI. Discussion: This study analyzed frequency drift data from 95 3T MRI scanners. Median levels of drift were relatively low (5-min average under 1 Hz), but the most extreme cases suffered from higher levels of drift. The extent of drift varied across scanners which both linear and nonlinear drifts were observed.Rights/Terms
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/16307ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118430
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Multi-vendor standardized sequence for edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
- Authors: Saleh MG, Rimbault D, Mikkelsen M, Oeltzschner G, Wang AM, Jiang D, Alhamud A, Near J, Schär M, Noeske R, Murdoch JB, Ersland L, Craven AR, Dwyer GE, Grüner ER, Pan L, Ahn S, Edden RAE
- Issue date: 2019 Apr 1
- Impact of frequency drift on gamma-aminobutyric acid-edited MR spectroscopy.
- Authors: Harris AD, Glaubitz B, Near J, John Evans C, Puts NA, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Tegenthoff M, Barker PB, Edden RA
- Issue date: 2014 Oct
- Prospective frequency correction using outer volume suppression-localized navigator for MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging.
- Authors: Lee CY, Choi IY, Lee P
- Issue date: 2018 Dec
- Big GABA: Edited MR spectroscopy at 24 research sites.
- Authors: Mikkelsen M, Barker PB, Bhattacharyya PK, Brix MK, Buur PF, Cecil KM, Chan KL, Chen DY, Craven AR, Cuypers K, Dacko M, Duncan NW, Dydak U, Edmondson DA, Ende G, Ersland L, Gao F, Greenhouse I, Harris AD, He N, Heba S, Hoggard N, Hsu TW, Jansen JFA, Kangarlu A, Lange T, Lebel RM, Li Y, Lin CE, Liou JK, Lirng JF, Liu F, Ma R, Maes C, Moreno-Ortega M, Murray SO, Noah S, Noeske R, Noseworthy MD, Oeltzschner G, Prisciandaro JJ, Puts NAJ, Roberts TPL, Sack M, Sailasuta N, Saleh MG, Schallmo MP, Simard N, Swinnen SP, Tegenthoff M, Truong P, Wang G, Wilkinson ID, Wittsack HJ, Xu H, Yan F, Zhang C, Zipunnikov V, Zöllner HJ, Edden RAE
- Issue date: 2017 Oct 1
- Effects of Frequency Drift on the Quantification of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Using MEGA-PRESS.
- Authors: Tsai SY, Fang CH, Wu TY, Lin YR
- Issue date: 2016 Apr 15