Neural adaptations to long-term resistance training: evidence for the confounding effect of muscle size on the interpretation of surface electromyography
Author
Škarabot, JakobBalshaw, Thomas Grant
Maeo, Sumiaki
Massey, Garry J
Lanza, Marcel Bahia
Maden-Wilkinson, Thomas M
Folland, Jonathan P
Date
2021-06-24Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)Publisher
American Physiological SocietyType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This study compared elbow flexor (EF; Experiment 1) and knee extensor (KE; Experiment 2) maximal compound action potential (Mmax) amplitude between long-term resistance trained (LTRT; n=15 and n=14, 6±3 and 4±1 years of training) and untrained (UT; n=14 and n=49) men; and examined the effect of normalising electromyography (EMG) during maximal voluntary torque (MVT) production to Mmax amplitude on differences between LTRT and UT. EMG was recorded from multiple sites and muscles of EF and KE, Mmax was evoked with percutaneous nerve stimulation, and muscle size was assessed with ultrasonography (thickness, EF) and magnetic resonance imaging (cross-sectional area, KE). Muscle-electrode distance (MED) was measured to account for the effect of adipose tissue on EMG and Mmax. LTRT displayed greater MVT (+66-71%, p<0.001), muscle size (+54-56%, p<0.001), and Mmax amplitudes (+29-60%, p≤0.010) even when corrected for MED (p≤0.045). Mmax was associated with the size of both muscle groups (r≥0.466, p≤0.011). Compared to UT, LTRT had higher absolute voluntary EMG amplitude for the KE (p<0.001), but not the EF (p=0.195), and these differences/similarities were maintained after correction for MED; however, Mmax normalisation resulted in no differences between LTRT and UT for any muscle and/or muscle group (p≥0.652). The positive association between Mmax and muscle size, and no differences when accounting for peripheral electrophysiological properties (EMG/Mmax), indicates the greater absolute voluntary EMG amplitude of LTRT might be confounded by muscle morphology, rather than provide a discrete measure of central neural activity. This study therefore suggests limited agonist neural adaptation after LTRT.Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/16198ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1152/japplphysiol.00094.2021
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Does normalization of voluntary EMG amplitude to M(MAX) account for the influence of electrode location and adiposity?
- Authors: Lanza MB, Balshaw TG, Massey GJ, Folland JP
- Issue date: 2018 Dec
- Spinal contribution to neuromuscular recovery differs between elbow-flexor and knee-extensor muscles after a maximal sustained fatiguing task.
- Authors: Vernillo G, Temesi J, Martin M, Krüger RL, Millet GY
- Issue date: 2020 Sep 1
- Neural adaptations after 4 years vs 12 weeks of resistance training vs untrained.
- Authors: Balshaw TG, Massey GJ, Maden-Wilkinson TM, Lanza MB, Folland JP
- Issue date: 2019 Mar
- Muscle electromyographic activity normalized to maximal muscle activity, not to Mmax, better represents voluntary activation.
- Authors: Diong J, Kishimoto KC, Butler JE, Héroux ME
- Issue date: 2022
- Neuromuscular adaptations associated with knee joint angle-specific force change.
- Authors: Noorkõiv M, Nosaka K, Blazevich AJ
- Issue date: 2014 Aug