A physician assistant entry-level doctoral degree: more harm than good?
Date
2021-05-14Journal
BMC Medical EducationPublisher
Springer NatureType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: As most health professions in the United States have adopted clinical or practice doctorates, there has been an ongoing debate on whether physician assistants (PAs) should transition from a master's to a doctorate as the terminal degree. The authors examined perceived risks, benefits and impact of transitioning to an entry-level PA doctoral degree. Methods: A multi-prong, mixed-methods approach was used that included a literature review and collecting quantitative and qualitative data using a survey and interviews. Bivariate analysis and binomial logistic regression were performed to evaluate relationships between perceptions/perspectives on an entry-level PA doctoral degree and the anticipated impact of it causing more harm than good to the PA profession. Deductive content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Results: Of 636 PA clinicians and students (46% response rate), 457 (72%) disagreed that an entry-level PA doctoral degree should be required. More than half of the respondents (54%) agreed that it should be offered but not required and 380 respondents (60%) agreed that an entry-level doctoral degree would cause more harm than good. Race, educational attainment, occupation, and length of practice as a PA were significantly associated with having a perception of causing more harm. There was strong positive association between the perception of a doctoral degree causing more harm with expectations of having a negative impact on the availability of clinical training sites (OR = 4.39, p < .05). The most commonly cited benefits were parity with other professions and competitive advantage, whereas the perceived risks were increased cost for education, decreased diversity in the profession, and negative impact on the PA/physician relationship. Conclusions: The major takeaway of our study was that perceived benefits and risks are strongly influenced by the lens of the stakeholder. While the majority of PAs and students appear to be not in favor mainly due to the potential harm, the proportion of those in favor is not insignificant and their views should not be ignored. Addressing concerns with key stakeholders could help the PA profession to transition to a doctoral degree with minimal adverse impact.Keyword
Benefits and risksEntry-level doctoral degree
Physician assistant
Post-graduate education
Terminal degree
Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/15676ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1186/s12909-021-02725-5
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Assessing the Economics of an Entry-Level Physician Assistant Doctoral Degree.
- Authors: Miller AA, Coplan B
- Issue date: 2022 Mar 1
- Curriculum essentials of an entry-level PA doctoral degree.
- Authors: Kayingo G, Gordes KL, Jun HJ, Fleming S, Kulo V, Cawley JF
- Issue date: 2021 Oct 1
- Physician Assistant Education Community Assumptions About an Entry-level Doctoral Degree.
- Authors: Brown D, Quincy B, Snyder J
- Issue date: 2021 Dec 1
- An Exploration into the Physician Assistant Entry-Level Doctoral Degree: Lessons Learned From Across Health Professions.
- Authors: Gordes KL, Fleming S, Kulo V, Cawley JF, Kibe L, Kayingo G
- Issue date: 2022 Mar 1
- Physician assistant students' perceptions of an entry-level doctorate degree.
- Authors: Swanchak LE, Levine AM, Arscott KE, Golden MA
- Issue date: 2011