Clinical Practice Variation and Outcomes for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Repair Surgery in Maryland: Report from a Statewide Quality Initiative
Author
Mazzeffi, MichaelGhoreishi, Mehrdad
Alejo, Diane
Fonner, Clifford E
Tanaka, Kenichi
Abernathy, James H
Whitman, Glenn
Salenger, Rawn
Lawton, Jennifer
Ad, Niv
Brown, James
Gammie, James
Taylor, Bradley
Date
2020-11-05Journal
Aorta (Stamford, Conn.)Publisher
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
A total of 233 patients were included from eight hospitals during the study period. Seventy-six percent of surgeries were done in two high-volume hospitals (≥10 cases per year), while the remaining 24% were done in low-volume hospitals. Operative mortality was 12.0% and varied between 0 and 25.0% depending on the hospital. Variables that differed significantly between hospitals included patient age, the percentage of patients in shock, left ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine level, arterial cannulation site, brain protection technique, tobacco use, and intraoperative blood transfusion. The percentage of patients who underwent aortic valve repair or replacement procedures differed significantly between hospitals (p < 0.001), although the prevalence of moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency was not significantly different (p = 0.14). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes including mortality, renal failure, stroke, or gastrointestinal complications between hospitals or based on arterial cannulation site (all p > 0.05). Patients who had aortic cross-clamping or endovascualr repair had more embolic strokes when compared with patients who had hypothermic circulatory arrest (p = 0.03).Rights/Terms
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/14836ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1055/s-0040-1714121
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Impact of center volume on outcomes of surgical repair for type A acute aortic dissections.
- Authors: Dobaria V, Kwon OJ, Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Sareh S, Aguayo E, Seo YJ, Benharash P
- Issue date: 2020 Jul
- Innominate artery cannulation for proximal aortic surgery: outcomes and neurological events in 263 patients.
- Authors: Preventza O, Garcia A, Tuluca A, Henry M, Cooley DA, Simpson K, Bakaeen FG, Cornwell LD, Omer S, Coselli JS
- Issue date: 2015 Dec
- [Clinical amalysis of left subclavian artery revascularization by stented trunk fenestration for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection].
- Authors: Tang YF, Han L, Lu FL, Song ZG, Lang XL, Zou LJ, Xu ZY
- Issue date: 2016 Jul 1
- Aortic arch cannulation with the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography for Stanford type A aortic dissection.
- Authors: Ma H, Xiao Z, Shi J, Liu L, Qin C, Guo Y
- Issue date: 2018 Oct 11