• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2021
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2021
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    The International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement on Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Matched Studies.

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Thourani, Vinod H
    Edelman, J James
    Holmes, Sari D
    Nguyen, Tom C
    Carroll, John
    Mack, Michael J
    Kapadia, Samir
    Tang, Gilbert H L
    Kodali, Susheel
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    Meduri, Christopher U
    Forcillo, Jessica
    Ferdinand, Francis D
    Fontana, Gregory
    Suwalski, Piotr
    Kiaii, Bob
    Balkhy, Husam
    Kempfert, Joerg
    Cheung, Anson
    Borger, Michael A
    Reardon, Michael
    Leon, Martin B
    Popma, Jeffrey J
    Ad, Niv
    Show allShow less

    Date
    2021-01-25
    Journal
    Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Publisher
    SAGE Publications Inc.
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1556984520978316
    Abstract
    Early mortality was lower in TAVR compared to SAVR in RCTs, but not propensity-matched studies in low-risk cohorts (0.66% vs 1.5%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 0.98, I2 = 0%). No difference in mortality between TAVR and SAVR was identified in intermediate-risk patients at early or later time points. Incidence of perioperative stroke in 3 low-risk RCTs was significantly lower in TAVR (0.4%) than SAVR (1.4%; OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.81, I2 = 0%). There was no difference in stroke for intermediate-risk patients between TAVR and SAVR. The expert panel of cardiologists and cardiac surgeons provided recommendations for TAVR and SAVR in various clinical scenarios.
    Keyword
    SAVR
    TAVR
    consensus statement
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/14696
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1177/1556984520978316
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles 2021

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    • Authors: Garg A, Rao SV, Visveswaran G, Agrawal S, Sharma A, Garg L, Mahata I, Garg J, Singal D, Cohen M, Kostis JB
    • Issue date: 2017 Jun
    • Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis.
    • Authors: Lou Y, Gao Y, Yu Y, Li Y, Xi Z, Swe KNC, Zhou Y, Nie X, Liu W
    • Issue date: 2020
    • Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
    • Authors: Kolte D, Vlahakes GJ, Palacios IF, Sakhuja R, Passeri JJ, Inglessis I, Elmariah S
    • Issue date: 2019 Sep 24
    • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.
    • Authors: Burrage M, Moore P, Cole C, Cox S, Lo WC, Rafter A, Garlick B, Garrahy P, Mundy J, Camuglia A
    • Issue date: 2017 Mar
    • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
    • Authors: Goel S, Pasam RT, Wats K, Patel J, Chava S, Gotesman J, Malik BA, Frankel R, Shani J, Gidwani U
    • Issue date: 2020 Jul
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.