Follow the money: Investigating gender disparity in industry payments among senior academics and leaders in plastic surgery
PublisherPublic Library of Science
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIntroduction: Differences in academic qualifications are cited as the reason behind the documented gender gap in industry sponsorship to academic plastic surgeons. Gendered imbalances in academic metrics narrow among senior academic plastic surgeons. However, it is unknown whether this gender parity translates to industry payments. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of industry payments disbursed to plastic surgeons in 2018. Inclusion criteria encompassed (i) faculty with the rank of professor or a departmental leadership position. Exclusion criteria included faculty (i) who belonged to a speciality besides plastic surgery; (ii) whose gender could not be determined; or (iii) whose name could not be located on the Open Payment Database. Faculty and title were identified using departmental listings of ACGME plastic surgery residency programs. We extracted industry payment data through the Open Payment Database. We also collected details on H-index and time in practice. Statistical analysis included odds ratios (OR) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (R). Results: We identified 316 senior academic plastic surgeons. The cohort was predominately male (88%) and 91% held a leadership role. Among departmental leaders, women were more likely to be an assistant professor (OR 3.9, p = 0.0003) and heads of subdivision (OR 2.1, p = 0.0382) than men. Industry payments were distributed equally to male and female senior plastic surgeons except for speakerships where women received smaller amounts compared to their male counterparts (median payments of $3,675 vs $7,134 for women and men respectively, p<0.0001). Career length and H-index were positively associated with dollar value of total industry payments (R = 0.17, p = 0.0291, and R = 0.14, p = 0.0405, respectively). Conclusion: Disparity in industry funding narrows at senior levels in academic plastic surgery. At higher academic levels, industry sponsorship may preferentially fund individuals based on academic productivity and career length. Increased transparency in selection criteria for speakerships is warranted. Copyright 2020 Ngaage et al.
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/14562
- Sex Disparity in Academic Rank and Industry Payments to Plastic Surgeons.
- Authors: Ngaage LM, Harris C, Rosen C, Ge S, Kim C, Rada EM, Manahan M, Silverman RP, Slezak S, Rasko YM
- Issue date: 2020 Feb
- Men Receive Three Times More Industry Payments than Women Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons, Even After Controlling for Confounding Variables.
- Authors: Forrester LA, Seo LJ, Gonzalez LJ, Zhao C, Friedlander S, Chu A
- Issue date: 2020 Jul
- Gender disparities in academic vascular surgeons.
- Authors: Carnevale M, Phair J, Batarseh P, LaFontaine S, Koelling E, Koleilat I
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
- The Glass Ceiling in Plastic Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Gender Gap in Career Advancement.
- Authors: Ngaage LM, Ngadimin C, Harris C, Rawes C, Wu Y, Landford W, Slezak S, Rasko YM
- Issue date: 2020 Sep
- The Dawn of Transparency: Insights from the Physician Payment Sunshine Act in Plastic Surgery.
- Authors: Ahmed R, Lopez J, Bae S, Massie AB, Chow EK, Chopra K, Orandi BJ, Lonze BE, May JW Jr, Sacks JM, Segev DL
- Issue date: 2017 Mar