Prediction of hypofibrinogenemia and thrombocytopenia at the point of care with the Quantra® QPlus® System.
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Date
2021-01-01Journal
Thrombosis ResearchPublisher
Elsevier Ltd.Type
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Introduction: Low fibrinogen and platelet counts are associated with bleeding and the need for transfusion. In this study, we investigated whether the Quantra® QPlus® parameters Fibrinogen Contribution (FCS) and Platelet Contribution (PCS) to clot stiffness could predict commonly used fibrinogen and platelet transfusion thresholds in patients undergoing major surgical procedures. Methods: This study used data from a multicenter, prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing cardiac or major orthopedic surgery. Quantra and laboratory assays were performed in parallel at multiple time points. Logistic regression models were used to assess the ability of FCS and PCS to predict fibrinogen and platelet thresholds used to guide transfusions. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were analyzed to determine the diagnostic accuracy and the optimal FCS and PCS values corresponding to the laboratory-based thresholds. Results: The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for FCS at fibrinogen thresholds of <120, 150, and 200 mg/dl ranged from 0.96 to 0.89. Similarly, for PCS at platelet thresholds of <50, 80, 100,000/μl, AUCs ranged from 0.95 to 0.89. The proposed optimal FCS and PCS cutoff values showed high negative predictive value and high sensitivity and specificity (both >86%) at the lowest fibrinogen and platelet threshold levels. Conclusions: This study identifies potential cutoff values for QPlus FCS and PCS proposed for use in place of or in conjunction with laboratory-based assays fibrinogen and platelet thresholds to guide transfusion decisions in surgical patients. These cut-off values will need to be validated in future studies.Rights/Terms
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/14235ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.thromres.2020.11.008
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Multicenter Evaluation of the Quantra QPlus System in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Surgical Procedures.
- Authors: Groves DS, Welsby IJ, Naik BI, Tanaka K, Hauck JN, Greenberg CS, Winegar DA, Viola F
- Issue date: 2020 Apr
- A Comparative Study of SEER Sonorheometry Versus Standard Coagulation Tests, Rotational Thromboelastometry, and Multiple Electrode Aggregometry in Cardiac Surgery.
- Authors: Baryshnikova E, Di Dedda U, Ranucci M
- Issue date: 2019 Jun
- Clinical utility of the Quantra<sup>®</sup> point-of-care haemostasis analyser during urgent cardiac surgery.
- Authors: Zghaibe W, Scheuermann S, Munting K, Blaudszun G, Besser M, Ortmann E, Klein AA
- Issue date: 2020 Mar
- Comparison of the Quantra QPlus System With Thromboelastography in Cardiac Surgery.
- Authors: DeAnda A, Levy G, Kinsky M, Sanjoto P, Garcia M, Avandsalehi KR, Diaz G, Yates SG
- Issue date: 2021 Apr
- Performance of functional fibrinogen thromboelastography in children undergoing congenital heart surgery.
- Authors: Gautam NK, Cai C, Pawelek O, Rafique MB, Cattano D, Pivalizza EG
- Issue date: 2017 Feb